|
|
Just The First Step
Saddam is dead, but Saddam's hanging had nothing to do with how
many people he killed or caused to die. All aboard, friends,
Saddam's death is just one stop on this long Israeli train of Arab
holocaust.
|
| |
|
Who Where Saddam's Executioners?
What exactly happened in that execution chamber? Inquiring people
wanted to know. Who was there and what did they say? Was it Muqtada
Al sader's people? Was it the Americans? Was it the Shiites?
The real story got buried in the sensational details of
what took place during the hanging and the case was used to yet
inflame sectarian violence amongst the Iraqi people.
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
Aldujail Issue
Saddam was hung because he executed 148 Shiites, who tried to
assassinate him in the middle of the Iran-Iraq war: Some of those
arrested, admitted to being Iranian agents.
|
| |
|
Gassing Of The Kurds
Why wasn't Saddam tried on the gassing of the Kurds.
What about the other atrocities committed by Saddam's regime?
And, by the way, that regime should not be singled out, because most
regimes in the area will condemn to death those who try to
assassinate their leaders. What about Halabjah and the gassing of
the Kurds? Don't you think the Kurds wanted to try him for that too?
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
Lots Of Questions
What about the war with Iran, the invasion of Kuwait, the killing
of Al-Sader, the killings of his own son-in-law and other relatives?
What could Saddam have said about all that?
What would he have said about his connections to US and the CIA?
|
| |
|
Saddam's Judges
The United States occupation forces that setup the kangaroo court
and even approved the judges, and removed judges, who were deemed
friendly to
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
Hung On A Holy Day
Why hang Saddam on the first day of Eid Al-adha, where, in fact,
Iraqi laws prohibit the execution of anyone on that particular day.
I am sure the Americans could have kept him for one more day if they
wanted to.
But hanging him on that day played well in the script of why we
went to war against Iraq in the first place. So, why did we go over
to Iraq destroyed the country, and killed its President?
|
| |
|
Saddam's Staged Capture
The story of a few marines discovering a billionaire hiding in a
rabbit hole, never made any sense. He was probably found, drugged
and thrown in the hole as a Zionist staged publicity stunt.
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
The Degrading Of A Country's President
He was kept in a tiny cell, and fed Fruit Loops by a Jewish army
nurse called Robert Ellis. The sole purpose was to keep him alive so
he could be publicly hanged.
To this day Saddam asked, " Why did the Americans invade Iraq?"
|
| |
|
A Message To Others
And that is the tragedy of Arab leaders. A president of what once
was the strongest and most technological Arab country had no clue
why he was invaded and his country destroyed. How many other Arab
leaders have no clue of what's coming to them?
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
Saddam's Hanging Was About Oil
Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, says that the area of the
Jewish State stretches: "From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates."
Rabbi Fischmann, member of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, declared
in his testimony to the U.N. Special Committee of Enquiry on 9 July
1947: "The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt up to the
Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon."
|
| |
|
Israel's Strategy
"This strategy paper plan operates on two essential premises. To
survive, Israel must become an imperial regional power, and 2) must
effect the division of the whole area into small states by the
dissolution of all existing Arab states." This document is a
detailed document of Israel's strategy for the Middle East, which is
based on breaking up Arab countries into small, weak, and ethnically
structured states.
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
Israel Wants Countries Broken Up
The Document stated: " The existence, prosperity and
steadfastness of the Jewish state will depend upon its ability to
adopt a new framework for its domestic and foreign affairs." "All
the Arab States east of Israel are torn apart, broken up and riddled
with inner conflict." "Iraq is, once again, no different in essence
from its neighbors, although its majority is Shi'ite and the ruling
minority Sunni. Sixty-five percent of the population has no say in
politics, in which an elite of 20 percent holds the power. In
addition there is a large Kurdish minority in the north, and if it
weren't for the strength of the ruling regime, the army and the oil
revenues, Iraq's future state would be no different than that of
Lebanon in the past or of Syria today.
|
| |
|
Did Israel Formant The Iran-Iraq War
The seeds of inner conflict and civil war are apparent today
already, especially after the rise of Khomeini to power in Iran, a
leader whom the Shiites in Iraq view as their natural leader."
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
Why Iraq And Not Syria?
"Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the
other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel's targets. Its
dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq
is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power, which
constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will
tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is
able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind
of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will
shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into
denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into
provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman
times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the
three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi'ite areas in
the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north. It is
possible that the present Iranian-Iraqi confrontation will deepen
this polarization." As you see here in simple English Israel planned
along time ago to break up Iraq. Now we move to Israel's plan of
attack. Since Israel was unable to accomplish the task of breaking
up Iraq on its own therefore, it had to give the job to a surrogate
power. That power of course is the U.S.
|
The Israeli Goals
The second document was prepared back in 1992 by the Cheney
Defense Department under the administration of George H.W.Bush and
came to be known publicly as the 2004 book: The Rise of the Vulcans,
reported that these men were given the task of devising the DPG, a
classified document that outlines U.S. military strategies and
provides a framework for developing the defense budget. Libby and
Wolfowitz were given the task of devising a new framework for the
U.S. policy in the post cold-war era. Khalilzad, a long time aid to
Wolfowitz was given the task of drafting the report, probably just
to have a Muslim in the midst of this complicated policy paper.
Other participants in this project were Richard Pearle, and Albert
Wohlstetter who was credited by many to be Wolfowitz and Pearle
mentor.
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
US Military To Do Israel's Bidding
The main points of this document were: Massive increase in
defense spending, the U.S. is the only superpower in the World,
prevent any regional power from challenging the U.S., the use of
preventive or preemptive force to protect U.S. interests, and
interfering in disputes throughout the World even when the U.S. is
not involved in these disputes. They stated that the United States
should â¤retain the preeminent responsibility for addressing
selectively those wrongs which threaten not only our interests, but
those of our allies or friends, or which could seriously disrupt
international relations?
|
Israel is referred to as an ally and a friend of the U.S. by most
government officials in America every chance they get. Just keep
this in mind as you follow this plan, which took 10 years to
implement. When news of the plan was first leaked out to the public
in 1992, the White House publicly rejected it and distanced itself
from the people who worked on it. Interestingly enough the men who
were an outcast during the rein of Bush the father, became the
rulers of the White House during the rein of Bush the son, who also
thinks of himself as the holy ghost.
|
In 1996 another document was prepared by the Institute for
Advanced Strategic and Political Studies by the "Study Group on a
New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000" Wolfowitz and Pearle among others
drafted the document entitled A Clean Break: A New Strategy
for Securing the Realm" this document was a straight forward
strategy paper or a plan of what Israel should do to become the only
regional power in the Middle East. The document stated: "Israel can
shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and
Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This
effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq â¤"
an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right-" This
clearly proves that the removal of Saddam Hussein from power is an
Israeli plan that took place long before September 11, 2001.
|
 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Israel Wants The Mideast And Has The Power
I t was also written: "Israel can make a clean break from the
past and establish a new vision for the U.S.-Israeli partnership
based on self-reliance, maturity and mutuality - not one focused
narrowly on territorial disputes - Israel's 'new strategy' based on
a shared philosophy of peace through strength. In other words its
time for Israel to step up and claim "what is rightfully hers", the
foreign policy of the United States based on the premise that AIPAC
is in total control of Congress, and other institutions such as
JINSA are in control of policy. Israel no longer needs to operate
behind the scenes.
|
| |
|
This document was written specifically for then Israeli
Prime-minister, Benjamin Netanyahu as a guide for Israeli foreign
policy. When presented to then President Clinton, he did not accept it
and refused to make a move in the removal of Saddam. It was no surprise
that most of these so called neocons, Zionist Jews, ended up securing
the Realm in George W Bush's administration making the decision on their
own to remove Saddam. Douglas Feith who ended up running the office of
Special Plans at the Pentagon under Wolfowitz, who was Rumsfeld's Deputy
Secretary of Defense in the first G. W. Bush administration. This
occurred during the run-up to the war on Iraq where the Niger Uranium
story was fabricated and used as one of the pretences to attack Iraq.
There were other well known Zionists with sensitive policy making
positions such as David Wurmser, who was appointed by Vice-president
Cheney as Middle East Advisor, and James Colbert, Communication Director
of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs.
You might wonder how these Zionists sold the idea of destroying
Iraq for Israel to others in the United States who may not be as
enthusiastic about making such a decision for Israel's benefit. This
is not the problem it might appear to be. There are always other
documents of a similar nature that could be churned up to fit the
U.S. psyche. This brings us up to the fourth document that was
prepared by the same cabal, l The Project for the New American
Century This document was based on the 1992 and renewed
few months before Bushâ¤s regime was installed in 2000 by a single
manâ¤s vote in the 5-4 supreme court decision. Like the old 1992
document this one called for: An attack on Iraq and the removal of
Saddam regime, huge increase in military budget, establishing new
American military bases all over the world, stressing the concept of
"pre-emptive war" and unilateral action as a strategic policy by
circumventing the UN. As you can see the plan to attack Iraq was
planned years before the planes hit the towers and at a time when
Bin Laden was an American asset. As you can see this plan looks
pretty good for the American appetite for world hegemony.
|
 |
The 2000 Power Grab
Looking at the list of signatories to the Project for the New
American Century makes one understand better what happened in Florida in
2000 with the presidential election. These people had to win in order
for 9/11 to take place, Iraq and Saddam destroyed, and the rest of the
Arab countries to start the count down to capitulation to Israel. Here
is a partial list of signatories to this document, and the positions
they held at the start of the war: Dick Cheney, became Vice-President,
Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, Paul Wolfowitz, Deputy Secretary
of Defense, I. Lewis Libby, Chief of Staff to Dick Cheney, Peter Rodman,
Assistant to Secretary of Defense, Elliot Abrams, Bush's National
security advisor, Richard Perle, member of Bush's Defense policy Board,
Jeb Bush, the president's brother, Paula Dobriansky, Undersecretary of
State for Global Affairs, Peter Rodman, Rumsfeld's Assistant for
International Security Affairs, Randy Scheunemann, Advisor to Rumsfeld
in Iraq, and others. I don't know why we call them neocons, they are old
cons. There is one striking similarity between these people:
The vast majority of them are Jewish, and all of them are Likudnics
who think of Israel's welfare before that of the U.S. These people have
been planning this for over a quarter of a century, and when the time
was right, they all got in their predefined positions and executed the
plan perfectly. Once they started the domino effect of sectarian
violence in Iraq, they can sit back and watch the rest of the Arab World
follow suit, or that is what they hoped would happen?
Some people might say, "Here we go again, blaming everything on the
Zionist Jews". I say, they are wrong. The documents, the people, their
ideology, the positions they held, their hatred, their ambitions, and
their names say so; I am just making words out of alphabets. But I will
leave you with what representative James Moran of Virginia, who lost his
Democratic leadership post, told supporters that the "Jewish community"
was responsible for the war. The Realm is secured.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment