Hillary Clinton And The Amelia Earhart Cover-Up
Being a true student of history, and especially trying to find the
truths about the most volatile period of human history, the 20th
century, I have always been fascinated by the circumstances behind
someone who I think was one of the bravest pilots of that period...
Amelia Earhart... And the strange circumstances behind her disappearance
shortly after July 2nd, 1937.. 75 years ago this year... on a flight
towards Howland Island in the central Pacific Ocean....
It has always troubled me when the so called "history" books claim Amelia Earhart's disappearance in the Pacific Ocean in 1937 was due to her "incompetence" , "inexperience", or even "pilot error" when I have found from other references that her flying skills were actually second to none... Many have to consider the time frame of the 1930's and the fact that during that time frame there were almost no female pilots anywhere in the world, period...For Amelia to excel at flying and attempt an around the world flight at the time of her disappearance is actually a most remarkable feat.
Years ago, I had stumbled across many different stories about how shortly after the American invasion of Saipan island in the Marianas on June 15th, 1944, some soldiers came across the possible remains of Amelia Earhart's aircraft. There were also reports from some of the local Saipan islanders of two white Americans who were on the island and shortly afterwards executed as "spies". Many claimed independently that one was definitely a woman....So the mystery of Amelia Earhart's disappearance suddenly became even more stranger... How in the hell did she land up on Saipan?
I came across an absolutely fabulous article, from Mike Campbell, through a fellow real truth seeker, Buelahman, who writes his blog "Buelahman's Revolt" at www.buelahman.wordpress.com, entitled: "Hillary Clinton And The Amelia Earhart Cover-Up" that contains some astounding information pertaining to Amelia Earhart's disappearance and the strong possibility that she really was on a spying mission for the United States government.... I want to share this important article right here for my own readers to view for themselves, and I do have my own thoughts and comments to follow:
NTS Notes: I again want to thank Mike Campbell, and of course, Buelahman, for this report...
I may not agree with all of the assertions presented in this article, but it does appear that what we have been told about Amelia Earhart's disappearance in our false history books is indeed pure and utter bullcrap.
Considering that the southern edge of the Marshall Islands are a long way from Howland Island, it does appear that for her to venture that far off course does indeed mean that she had orders to obviously do so. I do not believe that it was due to "pilot error" at all....
We know already that what we have been told about the entire history of that period of relations between Japan and the United States is nothing but lies, including the circumstances behind how the US enticed the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor in 1941... So why would the disappearance of Amelia Earhart be any different?
One final question: Will the US government eventually come clean about the facts behind Amelia Earhart's disappearance? In my honest opinion..I seriously doubt it....
More to come
NTS
It has always troubled me when the so called "history" books claim Amelia Earhart's disappearance in the Pacific Ocean in 1937 was due to her "incompetence" , "inexperience", or even "pilot error" when I have found from other references that her flying skills were actually second to none... Many have to consider the time frame of the 1930's and the fact that during that time frame there were almost no female pilots anywhere in the world, period...For Amelia to excel at flying and attempt an around the world flight at the time of her disappearance is actually a most remarkable feat.
Years ago, I had stumbled across many different stories about how shortly after the American invasion of Saipan island in the Marianas on June 15th, 1944, some soldiers came across the possible remains of Amelia Earhart's aircraft. There were also reports from some of the local Saipan islanders of two white Americans who were on the island and shortly afterwards executed as "spies". Many claimed independently that one was definitely a woman....So the mystery of Amelia Earhart's disappearance suddenly became even more stranger... How in the hell did she land up on Saipan?
I came across an absolutely fabulous article, from Mike Campbell, through a fellow real truth seeker, Buelahman, who writes his blog "Buelahman's Revolt" at www.buelahman.wordpress.com, entitled: "Hillary Clinton And The Amelia Earhart Cover-Up" that contains some astounding information pertaining to Amelia Earhart's disappearance and the strong possibility that she really was on a spying mission for the United States government.... I want to share this important article right here for my own readers to view for themselves, and I do have my own thoughts and comments to follow:
Hillary Clinton and the Amelia Earhart Cover-up
Posted by BuelahMan on August 9, 2012
Hillary Clinton and the Amelia Earhart Cover-up
Review of Amelia Earhart: The Truth at Last by Mike Campbell
Few things are more unsettling,
From experience I know,
Than to feel a building shaken
By quaking ground below.
But I’ve felt one discomfiture
Of almost comparable size,
Discovering that our “free” press
Purveys official lies.
Seventy-five years ago this summer America’s “First Lady of Flight,”
Amelia Earhart, along with her navigator, Fred Noonan, disappeared—at
least from public view—in their two-engine Lockheed Electra, NR 16020,
somewhere in the South Pacific. They were on an ambitious
round-the-world flight from an east to west direction, and they had
already completed a good part of it. The voyage had begun in Burbank,
California, on May 21, 1937. The most dangerous leg of the journey was
the 2,556-mile stretch from Lae, New Guinea, to tiny Howland Island,
1,900 miles southwest of Honolulu. They were to arrive on July 2, but
they never made it. A massive search was launched involving seven ships
and sixty-three aircraft of the U.S. military. They searched 262,281
square miles of ocean for sixteen days and found nothing, not even an
oil slick or a particle of debris. The Japanese, who controlled the
Marshall Islands to the north of Howland claimed that their seaplane
tender, the Kamoi, was also involved in the search. We learn
from Campbell, though, that the claim, like so much we have been told
about the Earhart disappearance, is not true.
The official conclusion is that the Electra, experiencing inexplicably poor radio communications with the Coast Guard vessel Itasca, which
was supposed to guide her into Howland, ran out of fuel, crashed, and
sank into the depths of the Pacific. If the testimony of a veritable
host of witnesses has any credibility at all, that claim is not true,
either. That is to say that it falls into the large and growing
category of “official lie.” It may not be the most important one, but
it would be hard to find one that is more blatant or brazen. Now, it
would it appear that the latest variation of that lie has been bought
into by no less an illustrious government personage than Secretary of
State Hillary Rodham Clinton.
The first thing that one discovers when looking into the contrary
eyewitness evidence related to the Earhart disappearance is that
Campbell sits at the peak of a rather impressive pyramid of citizen
evidence gatherers on the subject. Beneath him on the pyramid, among
others, are a number of veterans of the U.S. military. Preeminent among
them was the late Thomas E. Devine, author of the 1987 book, Eyewitness: The Amelia Earhart Incident. Devine,
a twenty-eight-year-old Army sergeant at the time, was among the troops
who captured Saipan from the Japanese in July of 1944. While on Saipan
he had a life-changing experience. He saw what he is certain was
Amelia Earhart’s Lockheed Electra. He wrote down the “NR 16020” written
on the plane and remembers wondering what the “NR” meant. He also
witnessed the burning of the airplane upon the orders of American
government officials in civilian clothes. Devine died in 2003, but not
before granting a short interview that can be seen on Rich Martini’s
YouTube video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tDEsTQwBVk. That is a clip from Martini’s film, “Eyewitness Accounts of What Happened to Amelia Earhart’s Plane.”
Mike Campbell
worked as a writer while on active duty in the Navy and for the
Department of Defense in a public affairs capacity until his retirement
in 2008. He collaborated with Devine on the 2002 book, With Our Own Eyes: Eyewitnesses to the Final Days of Amelia Earhart, and with his latest work shows himself to be more than capable of carrying Devine’s torch for truth.
An absolutely key character in verifying Devine’s claim that he saw
Amelia Earhart’s airplane on Saipan, and he saw it burned, is Earskin J.
Nabers (who went by his middle name of “Julious” as we see in the same video,
filmed in May 2003, in which Devine appears). Nabers, who died in 2006,
was ferreted out by Devine through a notice he placed in the spring
1992 issue of Follow Me, the official publication of the 2nd
Marine Division Association, seeking “any of the Marines, who, during
the invasion of Saipan, were placed on guard duty at Aslito Field, to
guard a padlocked hangar containing Amelia Earhart’s airplane.”
Charles W. Voyles, a veteran from Memphis, Tennessee, saw the notice
and wrote Devine about Nabers of Baldwyn, Mississippi, the new secretary
of the Mississippi chapter of 2nd Division veterans. Voyles
had heard through the grapevine that Nabers had been “around the hangar
at Aslito Field, which contained Amelia Earhart’s plane,” Voyles wrote
to Devine. Nabers, too, had seen the notice, but it took the letter
from Devine and months of prodding by family and friends before he
opened up and responded to Devine.
For anyone who might try to dismiss the numerous veterans and
residents of Saipan and the Marshall Islands who have now come forward
with first hand or very good second hand knowledge of Earhart’s capture
by the Japanese, reading the various accounts we find in Campbell’s book
shows the reticence of Nabers to be more the rule than the exception.
Jerrell H. Chatham of Avinger, Texas, is fairly typical, “All these
years since my time in the Marines,” he wrote to Devine, “I have been
afraid to say very much about this Amelia Earhart thing.” Chatham and
other military witnesses on Saipan had their “chilling awakening” long
before this writer did.
What Nabers had to say, though, stands out in its importance. He was
the clerk who decoded the orders first to fly the plane and then to
destroy it, and he heard it repeatedly explicitly identified as Amelia
Earhart’s airplane. He also witnessed the carrying out of the orders.
Crashed-and-sank proponents, who dismiss eyewitness accounts out of
hand for the most specious of reasons, are invariably stopped in their
tracks when confronted with Nabers’ report…
Nabers offered them nothing to reinterpret or deconstruct, because a
Marine code clerk working in a high-security message center on Saipan
could not possibly misread, misunderstand, or imagine a series of
messages he received announcing the discovery of Earhart’s plane,
followed by the plan to fly it, and finally, the order to destroy it.
Faced with the implacable nature of Nabers’ story, cynics have only two
choices: to flatly accuse Nabers of lying, or to remain silent.
Realizing the former option would reveal their inherent dishonesty—or
worse, their stupidity—they reluctantly choose to withdraw or to change
the subject. (Campbell, pp. 237-238)
Before he had flushed out Nabers and the aforementioned Chatham, who
reported seeing Earhart’s plane in the air on Saipan and being ordered
to transport two crates that he was told contained the remains of
Earhart and Noonan, Devine had concluded his 1987 Eyewitness
book with a call for others to come forward with information. That plea
had attracted the attention of number of Saipan veterans, among whom
was the other Marine who appears in the Martini video, Robert E. Wallack
of Woodbridge, Connecticut. Wallack, who died in 2008 at age 83, is
very clear here in his recollection of the discovery of Amelia Earhart’s
briefcase in a safe that he and some other Marines had blown open:
The contents were official-looking papers all concerning Amelia
Earhart: maps, permits and reports apparently pertaining to her
around-the-world flight. I wanted to retain this as a souvenir, but my
Marine buddies insisted that it may be important and should be turned
in. I went down to the beach where I encountered a naval officer and
told him of my discovery. He gave me a receipt for the material, and
stated that it would be returned to me if it were not important. I have
never seen the material since.
I wish to make a point here concerning the attaché case and the
contents. The case did not appear as if it had ever been immersed in
water and the contents were not blurred at all. Therefore these items
could not have been obtained from a plane that had been reported down at
sea some seven years prior to this event. (Campbell pp. 204-205)
Earlier Accounts of Earhart on Saipan
From 1944 when Saipan was captured to 1987 when Devine published his
first book is quite a long time. If Earhart, Noonan, and their airplane
had all been on Saipan one would expect that some word of it would have
come out even if the U.S. and Japanese governments wanted to suppress
it. Indeed it had, and very early, in 1944:
SAIPAN, July 8 (Delayed) (INS) – The mystery of what happened to
Amelia Earhart, famous American aviatrix, popped up again today—this
time on Saipan. The discovery of an album filled with Amelia Earhart
pictures here on this battle-torn island revived the search for an
answer to the seven-year mystery of the fate of America’s number one
woman flier. Some marines reported finding the album filled with
pictures of Amelia Earhart clothed in sport togs. There were no other
pictures in the album. (Campbell, p. 201)
That little item appeared in newspapers across the country, but it bore no byline and there was never a follow-up.
The next mention in the United States of Earhart in Saipan came was
by an assistant English professor at the U.S. Air Force Academy, Captain
Paul Briand, Jr., in his 1960 book, Daughter of the Sky: The Story of Amelia Earhart. Josephine
Blanco Akiyama, a Saipan native, had worked for a U.S. Navy dentist in
Saipan and had told him of seeing, as an 11-year-old, Earhart and
Noonan’s arrival in Tanapag Harbor in what she described as a crash
landing. The dentist had passed the story along to Briand, who
interviewed Ms. Akiyama.
She saw the American woman standing next to a tall man wearing a
short-sleeved sports shirt, and was surprised because the woman was not
dressed as a woman usually dressed. Instead of a dress, the American
woman wore a man’s shirt and trousers; and instead of long hair, she
wore her hair cut short, like a man. The faces of the man and woman
were white and drawn, as if they were sick.
The book received almost no attention, but in the meantime Ms.
Akiyama had immigrated to San Mateo, California, and told her story to San Mateo Times reporter
Linwood Day. The article that Day wrote came to the attention of a
newsman at KCBS radio in nearby San Francisco, Fred Goerner. Goerner
became a lifelong researcher of the case and his work in uncovering
witnesses, highlighted in his 1966 book, The Search for Amelia Earhart,
rivals that of Devine. Goerner traveled to Saipan and found a number
of witnesses who essentially corroborated Ms. Akiyama’s account of
Earhart and Noonan being held captives there. Well before Devine,
Goerner with his book also caused a number of Saipan veterans to come
forward and contact him concerning evidence of Earhart’s captivity that
they had encountered there.
Campbell’s book is replete with many
detailed accounts from both island natives and U.S. military veterans.
Crash in the Marshall Islands
Goerner’s greatest contribution, though, one gathers from Campbell,
is his pursuit of evidence that the original crash site of Earhart’s
Electra was not in Saipan but in the Marshall Islands some 800 miles to
the north of Howland. Saipan, after all, is almost due north of
Earhart’s departure point and Howland Island is some 2,500 miles to the
east northeast. The Marshalls were also under control of the Japanese
and it is more readily believable that Earhart could have ended up
there, groping northward while thinking she had missed Howland to the
south.
A key witness that Goerner discovered in the Marshalls was a Japanese
medical corpsman who was sixteen years old at the time named Bilimon
Amaron. Though born in Japan, he spent most of his life in the
Marshalls, where he became a prosperous businessman. He said that in
the summer of 1937 he was summoned to a Japanese tender ship to treat
the minor injuries of an American man with dark hair and blue eyes, and a
large silver plane with a broken-off wing was being pulled in a sling
behind the ship. Amaron can be heard after the 2 minute 50 second mark
in the Rich Martini video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eS3p6KQyKhE.
A number of researchers have examined the Marshall Islands evidence
through the years, perhaps the most important of whom was former Air
Force C-47 pilot Vincent V. Loomis. His 1985 book, Amelia Earhart: The Final Story was heavily praised in a review by Jeffrey Hart in the October 18, 1985, National Review. Hart concluded flatly, “The mystery is a mystery no longer.”
Loomis and others have reached the conclusion that the vessel upon
which Amaron treated the two American fliers was the “surveying” ship,
the Koshu. These researchers have also found many people who
either corroborate Amaron’s story or saw the two Americans
independently. The following account refers to a 1997 trip to the
Marshalls by researcher Bill Prymak.
During the Majuro-to-Honolulu leg of his flight back to the United
States, Prymak met the most powerful man in the Marshalls, Robert
Reimers, founder of a small empire of hotels, shopping centers, and
commercial outlets in the islands. Reimers, healthy and alert at
eighty-eight, was forthcoming in answering Prymak’s questions about
events before World War II, especially those about Earhart’s alleged
presence in the islands. Reimers said he knew Bilimon Amaron well, and
vouched for his honesty.
“It was widely known throughout the islands by both Japanese and
Marshallese that a Japanese fishing boat first found them and their
airplane near Mili [Atoll],” Reimers told Prymak. They then transferred
them to a bigger boat. They were brought to Jabor, where Bilimon
treated them. Oscar deBrum and the Carl Heine family…were living there
and knew of this. They were then taken to Kwajalein and from there to
Truk and then Saipan. There was no mystery…everybody knew it.” Asked
why the Japanese vehemently denied seeing Earhart and Noonan, Reimers
replied, “Even in 1937, an intrusion into these islands was a very
serious offense. And in the case of Earhart, a woman pilot, great cover
and secrecy was placed…by the Japanese. But, of course, these are our
islands. And my people—even in their fear—proved very resourceful in
knowing such things.” (Campbell, pp. 174-175)
The Reimers version of events, it would appear, is every bit as much
the established truth in the Marshall Islands as the crashed-and-sank
theory is the official truth in the United States. So much is that the
case that in 1987 the Marshallese government issued a set of four postage stamps
commemorating Amelia Earhart’s unfortunate brush with the island. One
of the stamps is titled, “Crash Landing at Mili Atoll July 2, 1937” and
another depicts the “Recovery of Electra by the Koshu.” (The stamps are available for purchase at cyberstamps.com.)
Forrestal Not on Saipan
Although they put out their 2002 book as a joint effort, Campbell
parts company with Thomas Devine on another Devine article of faith
besides the initial crash site of the Earhart airplane. Devine went to
his grave maintaining that he had seen Secretary of the Navy James
Forrestal on Saipan directing the handling and final destruction of
Earhart’s airplane. Campbell has meticulously examined the record of
Forrestal’s official movements and has concluded that there was no time
for Forrestal to have traveled to Saipan and returned to Washington.
Rather, Campbell believes that the man Devine saw was alleged
intelligence agent James H. Nichols, who faintly resembled Forrestal and
who was identified by Nabers from photographs as the man he saw
directing the Electra destruction operation on Saipan.
Devine’s belief that he saw Forrestal on Saipan is part and parcel
with his theory as to why the Electra was destroyed and why Earhart’s
captivity and death at the hands of the Japanese has been covered up.
Campbell, one gathers, believes that Devine has given his government too
much credit. From Devine’s perspective, the discovery of the airplane
and other Earhart artifacts on Saipan was as much a surprise to his
superiors as it was to him. Devine correctly recognized Forrestal as an
unusually farsighted and selfless
statesman. Forrestal, Devine thought, must have been looking ahead to
the need for harmony with Japan after the war’s end, and he must have
felt that news of what the Japanese had done to the popular Earhart
would have jeopardized that goal.
Why the Cover-up?
With Forrestal not even on Saipan, that seriously strained theory is
out the window. Campbell is certain that from Forrestal’s position in
the chain of command he knew about the cover-up, and like Devine,
Campbell believes that Forrestal’s knowledge of what actually happened
to Amelia Earhart was a factor in Forrestal’s almost certain murder.
But according to Campbell, the Earhart cover-up could only have been
orchestrated by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who was a horse of an entirely different color from Forrestal.
Roosevelt, according to long-time New York Times
Washington correspondent Turner Catledge, “was a consummate
manipulator, a man who misled, deceived, lied outright when it was
necessary to gain his ends.” One of those ends, according to Hamilton
Fish in FDR, The Other Side of the Coin: How We Were Tricked into World War II
(1976) was “provoking and forcing Japan into war…by ruse, trickery, and
deception—by hiding the truth as expertly as Lenin ever did.” (Fish, p.
10; the Catledge quote is from p. 11)
Drawing heavily upon the findings and theories of Goerner, who was
granted unusual access to documents and government officials during the
brief John Kennedy administration, Campbell suggests that the Earhart
expedition was heavily tied up with Roosevelt’s preparation for war with
Japan. What remains in question is only the extent to which she knew
that she was being used for that purpose. She might have known quite a
lot and the Japanese might well have been justified in regarding Earhart
and Noonan as spies.
Goerner interviewed Margot DeCarie, Earhart’s former secretary, by
phone at her home in North Hollywood, California, in the early 1960s.
Despite claiming that she had “promised secrecy” to an unknown party,
DeCarrie gave Goerner plenty to consider. “Do you really think Purdue
University bought that plane for Amelia,” she asked, “and do you think
that it was intended for some kind of vague experimentation?
Second, if
the whole thing was a publicity stunt…why did the government assign
some of its top experts to the flight…and why did President Roosevelt
have an airfield built for her?” (Campbell, p. 331)
In the Goerner scenario, the highest echelons of the U.S. government
knew all along that Earhart and Noonan had been captured by the
Japanese. Though his charge has never been substantiated, Goerner told
reporters in 1967 “that ‘a most reliable source’ informed him recently
the Navy intercepted Japanese messages at the time the fliers were lost
which indicated they were in Japanese hands.” It was a political
bombshell that suggests we had already broken the Japanese codes in 1937
and that on account of that, we would have had prior knowledge of the
Pearl Harbor attack. It came 33 years before Robert Stinnett made the
broken-code claim in his 2000 book, Day of Deceit: The Truth about FDR and Pearl Harbor,
but Goerner was generally ignored. This writer is of the opinion that
if we were in the process of breaking the Japanese codes, listening in
on how they dealt with Earhart would have provided an excellent
opportunity to nail down the process more completely.
As an establishment newsman, Goerner at his most influential was able
to gain some high level audiences for his discoveries and theories,
including a number of Congressmen. He made the following remarks before
the National, State, and Relations Subcommittee of the Republican
Platform Committee in Miami, Florida, on July 29, 1968:
It was well known within high ranking intelligence sources that Miss
Earhart, at the time of her disappearance, was under government
instructions to fly over and observe suspected Japanese military
developments in the islands of the Pacific. There were some serious
blunders made by the Navy in their attempt to provide Miss Earhart with
proper guidance following the completion of her observations and the
Navy was determined to conceal their participation and failure of this
part of the operation. The concealment of errors is congenital with the
armed services and particularly so in connection with any covert type
of operation such as this was. The mission was not specifically for the
United States Navy, but rather was ordered at the request of the
highest echelons of the government. (Campbell, p. 331)
Goerner was later to back off his claim that Earhart had explicit
orders to fly over Japanese territory and report her findings, but there
is no better explanation for the obvious cover-up that has taken place
than that the government had more to do with Earhart’s flight and knew
more about her disappearance from the beginning than what they have told
us. Under the larger Goerner scenario from which he did not back off,
the massive 16-day search operation for the missing plane would have
been nothing but a gigantic sham, aimed primarily at deceiving the
Japanese, because we knew all along that they had Earhart and Noonan in
custody, but to let the world know would be to tip off the Japanese as
to how we knew. One can imagine FDR laughing up his sleeve at his
cleverness. Then with the sham threatened with exposure when Saipan was
taken, Roosevelt’s only option, as he must have seen it, was to attempt
to erase the evidence as fast as it appeared.
Continued Media Misdirection
According to Campbell, the contest between evidence revelation by
independent, truth-seeking American citizens on the one hand and
establishment erasure and misdirection on the other has continued—even
intensified—with respect to the Earhart disappearance right up to the
present day. Through the years some of the eyewitness testimony has
even made it into the national mainstream. The very genuine Robert
Wallack with his briefcase experience has been heard in 1990 on Unsolved Mysteries(along with Thomas Devine), in 1994 on CBS’s Eye to Eye with Connie Chung, and as late as 2006 in a special on Amelia Earhart on The National Geographic Channel’s Undercover History.
But the latter had the opportunity to use footage from the code clerk,
Nabers, which would have really nailed down the story of the Electra
destruction on Saipan, and they passed it up.
Now, in the summer seventy-five years after Earhart’s disappearance,
the national media have devoted their entire attention to an expedition
by one Ric Gillespie of an organization called TIGHAR (The International
Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery) to the vicinity of Gardner Island
(also known as Nikumaroro) in search of possible evidence of Earhart’s
fate. We learn from Campbell that his May 14 to June 14, 2010,
expedition was his ninth such trip.
“Gillespie offers nothing but the assorted refuse he continuously and
unsuccessfully tries to connect to the fliers or the Electra,” says
Campbell, “but with a compliant, supportive media and a strong
establishment wind at his back, he continues to receive untold hundreds
of thousands of dollars from various donors, disclosed and undisclosed,
for his serial expeditions to Nikumaroro.” (p. 382)
This time, much of the establishment wind has come from Hillary Clinton:
Why the US support for this effort? Well, for one thing, Clinton
herself is something of an Earhart aficionado.
She said that when she
was growing up in Illinois her mother was an Earhart fan and filled her
ears with stories of the aviatrix’s derring-do. This led Clinton to
dream of herself becoming an astronaut – so she wrote NASA when she was
13 to ask whether she could qualify.
“NASA wrote me back and said there would not be any women astronauts. And I was just crestfallen,” she said in her speech.
A second reason for today’s government involvement is that the US
government was heavily involved with Earhart’s effort in the first
place, in part due to its demonstration of American skill and technology
during the Great Depression. State Department personnel arranged for
visas and safe conduct for Earhart and Noonan and helped shepherd them
along the way. On the day she disappeared, a US Coast Guard cutter, the
Itasca, was in position off Howland to aid in radio direction finding
and resupply. (The Christian Science Monitor, March 20, 2012.)
Hillary and Gillespie can be seen here being much ballyhooed on CNN.
If the 1937 search was a sham, in light of the massive eyewitness
testimony brought forward in Campbell’s book, how much more obvious a
sham is this repeated searching for Earhart’s plane by Gillespie under
the glare of the U.S. news media! And what an affront it is to those
members of Tom Brokaw’s “greatest generation” who have had the courage
to come forward and to tell us frankly what they saw with their own
eyes! When our leaders have no further use for them, it would appear,
they really have no use for them.
As we survey what has been told to the public by the American press this year about the Earhart mystery, CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, The Washington Post, andHuffington Post,
the only hint we get that the latest Gillespie venture might be
undermined by eyewitness testimony is found in the left-liberal online Daily Beast. In The Daily Beast’s
article, Earhart biographer Susan Butler praises Gillespie and
disparages Goerner, echoing what she had to say in her 1997 book, East to the Dawn.
This is the same Susan Butler to whom Campbell devotes pages 392-411
and gives the section the title, “An Earhart Biographer’s Serial
Misstatements.”
One gets the impression that Butler would have hardly written
anything different had she been a paid propagandist for the Japanese
military government. “Would Butler have been so cavalier in advancing
her unfounded allegations against Goerner, who passed away five years
before East to the Dawn was published,” concludes Campbell, “had he been alive to defend himself?”
Don’t expect any of our mainstream press to be directing you to
Campbell’s book, though. If he is to be ignored, it will not be because
the case he makes for the capture of Earhart and Noonan by the Japanese
is too weak. It will be because it is too strong.
Oh yes, we find in this little July 17 item in The New York Times that the latest big Pacific search that Hillary gave the big send-off to has come up empty handed. What a surprise!
David Martin
August 7, 2012
h/t DCDave
Did I rub you the wrong way or
stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or
Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com
NTS Notes: I again want to thank Mike Campbell, and of course, Buelahman, for this report...
I may not agree with all of the assertions presented in this article, but it does appear that what we have been told about Amelia Earhart's disappearance in our false history books is indeed pure and utter bullcrap.
Considering that the southern edge of the Marshall Islands are a long way from Howland Island, it does appear that for her to venture that far off course does indeed mean that she had orders to obviously do so. I do not believe that it was due to "pilot error" at all....
We know already that what we have been told about the entire history of that period of relations between Japan and the United States is nothing but lies, including the circumstances behind how the US enticed the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor in 1941... So why would the disappearance of Amelia Earhart be any different?
One final question: Will the US government eventually come clean about the facts behind Amelia Earhart's disappearance? In my honest opinion..I seriously doubt it....
More to come
NTS
No comments:
Post a Comment