CITYBLOGGER..PENAFIAN Laman ini tidak bertanggungjawab atas hasil penulisan yang dipetik dari sumbe

Oh, American democracy Democracy is such a grand idea in theory. I mean, it's "power to the people"! How can "majority rule" not do no wrong?! (My apologies to people who have trouble comprehending the negation of negatives. My advice? Learn almost any other language. Double-negatives are not grammatically-incorrect in several non-English languages.) In America's case (since I can't claim to know much about how democracies in other nations work), the short answer to why democracy fails: lobbyists and minority groups. Well, maybe "fail" is too strong a term; let's go with "inefficientiates," that is, a pseudo-verb form of "inefficient." The origin of lobbyists is admirable, I'm sure, but in today's atmosphere, I'm very much not too confident that lobbying is all that "respectable" any longer. There's an urban-legend-like story of lobbying originating during President Ulysses S. Grant's terms in the 1870s. Because smoking was not allowed in the White House, President Grant would saunter over to the nearby Willard Hotel and smoke his cigars in the hotel lobby there. Eventually, it became known that President Grant frequented the lobby, so people wanting some Presidential influence would come to see him in the hotel lobby. Of course, the actual start of the term "lobbying" was in the U.K. in Parliament and the House of Commons, with "lobbying" occurring in the U.S. even before the Grant administration. But those stories aren't as fun as the Grant story, so I'm not going to share those. Over time, lobby groups developed, with some having more influence than others over Congress and such. How do they have more influence? Perhaps long histories with particular political parties, allegiances that may be difficult to break. Or maybe there are corrupt "deals" going on. Also plausible is that a good number of the "majority rule" people simply like the leader of a lobbyist group. Whatever the reason, lobbying undermines the basic ideals of democracy: rule by the people. Lobbyists have essentially changed the American democratic field to rule by a few passionate people. Don't get me wrong; it's admirable to be passionate about a political issue. However, when laws/bills/whatever are getting pushed based ultimately solely to just these passionate people, then what the hell happened to majority rule or rule by the people? Also of issue to me about democracy is its "majority rule" axiom. I mean, majority rule makes sense in small settings. For example, if a group of friends and I were trying to decide where to go eat, majority rule makes sense. It'll make most of us happy. But on a national scale? A lot of fucking people are going to be marginalized, and we're talking millions here. I mean, if you think about it ... ideally, all it takes is 50.01% of the population to approve something, and it would be law. What about the other 49.99%? Their voices are lost. (Of course, here enter lobbyists again....) So in America, white people comprise 66% of the population (in 2006). Majority rule, right? Therefore, who the fuck cares about the other races? If the white people can stick together, say goodbye to your rights, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Native Americans, etc. (Interestingly, in both houses of Congress, the two leading political parties tend to stick together within themselves too. They really shouldn't. If everyone were able to decide for their own stances on issues instead of blindly following whatever is the "Republican" or the "Democratic" option, maybe our government would be better.) Perhaps I'm missing something here, but I don't like "majority rule by the people." Of course, although it may not be a great system/process, democracy is the best we have--as far as appeasing the most people. We should just revert to authoritative dictatorships. I mean, if a lot of people are going to be unhappy, we might as well all be unhappy (except for the happy dictator). EDIT: Of course, the very next morning after I post this, I find this cool article/blog(?) on the evils of the history of lobbying. Unrelated, but I highly recommend Danish electronic musician Anders Trentemøller. This is his visually-stunning video for "Miss You": Posted by Timmy at 10:31 PM 0 comments: Post a Comment