A fearless president versus a chicken prime minister
Syrian President Basker al-Assad visited Israel's Ariel Sharon
Memories from a summer trip
The New Stürmer
Year 2001
Dear kindred and
fellow Aryans
My summer trip
This summer some
friends and I went on a short trip to Germany. During this trip we stopped at
the beautiful town of Glückstadt, the town in which Jews first settled in the
land belonging to the Danish kings. I have written about this story in a
letter called "The first Jew who settled in Denmark". You can read the letter
when visiting my webpage under The New Stürmer.
Glückstadt is
located on the north shore of the river Elbe some 80 km north east of Hamburg.
Glückstadt is located in a part of Germany where you will find very few
foreigners - thus it was refreshing to only see blond, blue-eyed people, in
contrast to the multi-culture trash one saw in Hamburg.
While in Glückstadt
we visited the home-museum, where I had an animated discussion with a
frustrated German of my own age. This German was defending the Jewish lies
regarding the holocaust. As I asked him which of the eight methods of killing
Jews at Berlitz he believed in, he did not know that the Jewish eyewitnesses
had claimed that eight different methods had been employed. But he gave me the
old story that his father, who had been at the Eastern front, had heard that
jews had been killed. He further claimed that the jews had been good citizens
of Germany. I gave him a lecture in revisionism, knowing that I was liable for
imprisonment had he called the police. I even told him that, regarding the
holocaust, I could believe and say whatever I wanted to in my homeland. I even
asked him why he could not do so in the ever most free country, on German
soil? Sorry, but he had no answers. Some Germans who were in the same room
during my hour-long discussion stayed and smiled at my friends, but sorely
none of them took part. The freedom in Germany is as the freedom once was in
communist/jewish Soviet: If you don't do as the Jews tell you, they will
imprison you.
I really feel sorry
for the people in "the country of poets and philosophers", Germany.
Syrian President
Baschar al-Assad visited German Kanzler Schröder
German Kanzler Gerhard Schröder
Germany has laws
allowing the country to imprison citizens of other countries if these citizens
have expressed disbelief in the jewish holocaust lies.
As you probably
know many Arabian politicians and intellectuals have expressed disbelief in
the jewish holocaust. President Baschar al-Assad has expressed his disbelief
in various newspapers in Syria. On September 5. 2000 he said to the Syrian
Times: "Since the discovery of the word holocaust, the jews have lived off
this world and suppressed the word with it. ... Regarding the gas chambers,
they were used to delouse clothing and other things used by the prisoners of
the concentration camps. There never was any gassing of jews."
President Baschar
al-Assad even said that racism in Germany during the Hitler era was less
rampant then the racism of today's Israel.
This man was
invited to Germany and he came. But Kanzler Schröder did not place him in
prison, nor did he charge him with disrespect of the dead jews, which he
should have done according to German laws.
The Jews living
in Germany required Kanzler Schröder to imprison President
Baschar al-Assad.
Many Jews backed this requirement before President Baschar al-Assad came. The
whole jewish community living in Germany cried prison because President
Baschar al-Assad is the first high profiled politician who has stood up to the
jews and their lies.
During a press
conference President Baschar al-Assad was asked by the jewish journalist Eran
Tiefenbrunn if he saw any parallels between how the jews were treated in
Germany during the Hitler era and how the Israelis treated the Palestinians
now. President al-Assad several times asked who the journalist was. Upon
finally learning that the journalist was a jew, the President refused to
answer.
To revisionists
around the world, President Baschar al-Assad is what they have been praying
for for a long time. He is a high-profile politician who is not afraid of
jewish suppression, nor is he afraid of telling what he thinks regarding the
greatest HOAX of the century.
As a result of
President Baschar al-Assad's brave and fearless actions, the world jewry is
now shaking in their shoes.
It will take many
more politicians to bring the jews down, but President Baschar al-Assad has
shown them the way.
What he also
demonstrated was that he was not afraid of entering Germany, in spite of the
laws there which could have imprisoned him for not believing the jewish hoax.
A cowardly
Sharon refused to visit Belgium
Ariel Sharon the killer
In the beginning of
July 2001, Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon was going on a trip to many
European countries, including Belgium.
After the hatchet
man of the Palestinian refuge camp Sabra and Schatila learned that a Belgian
judge was investigating the killing and wanted Sharon in prison for
questioning and for court, Sharon stuck the tail between his legs and changed
his plans. He did not want to face a Belgian court accusing him of the
massacres of Sabra and Schatila.
Is Sharon afraid of
appearing before a judge regarding what happened at those refugee camps in
September 1982?
Is the bloodthirsty
jew afraid that he can not control the Belgian court? Is he afraid that the
world finally will learn what kind of an eradicator he is?
What is more
remarkable than Sharon not going to Belgium is that the UN has not demanded
that Sharon be extradited from Israel to stand on trail for his crimes. This
is very remarkable since the jews have been looking for alleged war criminals
all over the world for the last 56 years.
Why does the jew
refuse to be put on trail for the pogroms he had ordered?
It would look bad
in the eyes of the world that a JEW could have ordered pogroms. It would hurt
the zionists' fabricated picture of the jew as a peace loving people, and
would give a true picture of the world's greatest eradicators.
But the world does
not have to bring Sharon to trial only for the massacre of two refugee camps.
They can bring every leading Israeli politician during the last 30 years to
trail for WAR CRIMES.
It is a war crime
for an occupying country to let its citizens settle in an occupied country.
The West Bank is occupied by Israel. Why does the UN not open a war crimes
tribunal against all Israeli politicians and military leaders? ONLY because
the world jewry and zionists don't allow the world to subject the jews to the
same laws under which any other countries or politicians are treated.
The difference
between a man who knows the truth and a liar
President Baschar
al-Assad knew he could defend his views on the holocaust and win his case had
he been brought before a judge in Germany, and so did the jewish community
living in Germany. Further, the jews did not want a prominent president on
trail for not believing in the HOAX.
A president could
not be tried without having at his disposal the means to defend himself that
any ordinary German is entitled to. A president would have been given all the
legal help he wanted, and he could have shown documents and forensic proofs
before the court. It is clear that the jews don't want these documents and
forensic proofs exhibited in a German court.
They could not have
kept on blackmailing countries and businesses after President Baschar al-Assad
had shown the real documents before a German court.
Sharon knew that he
could not successfully defend himself against the indictments a judge would
bring against him. That is why he will not appear before a judge.
A court case in
Belgium would have been devastating for all jewish activities all over the
world. If a jewish politician would have been put on trail for a massacre,
they could not have kept on killing innocent children in Palestine as they do
now.
The world jewry can
not tolerate such a thing. They want to go on killing Palestinians as the
talmud commands them to, without the world interfering or becoming aware of
their atrocities.
Here I give you
some clippings from Nordic news papers regarding the Sharon case.
Belgian Judge opens
a Law Suit on Sharon.
The Belgian
investigating judge Patrick Collignon has started investigating Israel’s prim
minister Ariel Sharon for his role in the massacre on Palestinian refugees in
Sabra and Chatila in 1982,
Sharon risks to be
indicted for crimes against humanity. Belgium has opened for placing anyone
for court, regardless of nationality or place, when it comes to war crimes and
genocide. Collignon is investigating Sharon if there is basis to take
him to court said Josef Colpin at the prosecuting authority in Brussel.
Collignon started
after he had heard allegations from two survivors which he believes.
No stop in Belgium
Sharon does not
look upon the announcement seriously, but he will not travel yo Belgium on his
tour to Europe this week. (Which should give you the dates.)
Belgium became
leader in EU, European Union, last week-end, so a visit would have been
naturally. Sharon stopes in Berlin and Paris. According the Israeli news paper
Ha’aretz Sharon had planned to visit Brussel on this tour.
Dialogues between
the two countries, Isreal and Belgium, must now take place outside Belgium,
Israeli source says.
Sabra and Chatila
Sharon’s problems
started after BBC in her prestigious program Panorama sat the surge-light on
Sharon’s past, his role during the massacre on at least 700 Palestinian
refugees u camps Sabra and Chatila in Beirut in 1982.
Read what Wikipedia
writes about the massacre;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabra_and_Shatila_massacre
The Massacre of Sabra
and Chatila in 1982
by
Professor Dr. Ahmad Al-Tal
http://www.jerusalemites.org/crimes/massacres/1.htm
An Israeli
investigation comity said after the massacre that Sharon had indirect
responsibility for the massacre which happened while his was Foreign Minister.
Many leading layers
and international law experts said to BBC during the program that Sharon could
and should be indicted for war crimes . 28 survivors of the massacre took
contact with a Belgian court after the program.
Universal
jurisdiction
Belgium said in
1992 that her courts should have universal jurisdiction in cases of war crimes
regardless of nationality of what the accused might say or where the crimes
took place.
During the
beginning of June a Belgian Court found two Catholic nonnes guilty for having
taken part in genocide in the home land, Rwanda, in 1994 and convicted them to
15 and 12 years prison.
A delegate of the
Israeli Director of Public Prosecutions travelled to Belgium last week to
investigate what problems Sharon would meet if he came yo the country. This
accotding to Ha’aretz.
Bad case.
Israeli diplomats
are following the case closely, but does not believe, according to Ha’aretz,
that Belgium will require Sharon extradited.
‘This is an
embarrassing and bad case’ said one diplomat to the news paper.
Israeli Foreign
Department’s legal advisor, Alan Baker, have warned that globalization of
international human laws might be bad for Israeli leaders and military.
Shimon Peres
Tow years ago
London took steps to demanded Shimon Peres extradited in conjunction with
Israeli massacre of 100 refugees in a UN-camp in Southern Lebanon in 1996.
A month ago, on Oct
25 2001, the following could be read in Nordic mews åaåers:
Ariel Sharon finds
a Belgian defender.
Israeli Prim
Minister Ariel Sharon have taken a Belgium defence layer to help him in the
notification regarding massacre of refugees in Lebanon in 1982.
This news was
brought by Israeli newspaper Ha’aretx Thursday. Sharon’s office has up till
now ignored notifications from tow Belgians and one Lebanon layer on behalf of
23 survivors after the massacre in the refugee camps of Sabra and Chatila.
Many hundred Palestinians were killed by Christian Lebanese Militia in a area
controlled by the Israeli military.
I leave you here
knowing that you fully follow my views in these cases.
Heil og sael
No comments:
Post a Comment