Hitler's Jewish Soldiers
The New Stürmer, Year 2002Jesus said, the Jews are liars, hypocrites, and deceivers. They twist the truth to their benefit and give us lies.
Dear kindred and fellow Aryans,
I am about to give my thoughts on a book, entitled, Hitler's Jewish Soldiers, by a Jewish "historian"--Bryan Mark Rigg. The book was published by University Press of Kansas, in 2002.
Bryan Mark Rigg
I claim Rigg is a Jew, and here are my reasons for saying that:
- Rigg was a volunteer in the Israeli Army.
Let us look at the facts:
- Israel will never allow a Gentile to serve in their army. They are doing too much killing of Lebanese and Palestinians to allow a Gentile to watch.
- Why should a Gentile be a volunteer in the Israeli army? An army which is only in war with a small group of civilians?
- Look at his face, it has Jew written all over it.
- By allowing a gentile to join up they might jeopardise the security of their operation. Israel will not allow that.
Before we start to look at the book there are a few things we must learn: A Mischling, is the common German National Socialist word for a person of mixed Aryan-Jewish ancestry. The word Mischlinge, is the German plural of Mischling.
We must also learn, from the author, the definition of a Jew, which is: A person born of a Jewish mother. According to Halakah (Jewish Law) -- if a person is born Jewish, that status remains forever.
One might think that a Jew would no longer be Jewish if he professed another religion, but this is not the case. I hereby state that Rigg's right to claim to be a "historian" is questionable. I back this claim by saying: Rigg has relied too much on other people's writing when it comes to quotes from German documents. More particularly, Rigg doesn't quote from Jews living in Germany's "WELTANSCHAUUNG". He quotes the same propaganda which International Jewry has repeated so often, since WW2. He does not mention the Jewish Declaration of War on Germany on March 24, 1933. Nor, does he mention the protest of Jews living in Germany to the declaration of war on Germany, given to the United States Embassador to Germany, on March 25, 1933. And - this is important - he does not mention the agreement between Germany and The Association of Jews in Germany, the Ha'avara Agreement, which had top priority for the German administration by November of 1933. You can go to my web-site under 2002 Edition and see the story, "The Pact Between Hitler and The Zionists". According to this pact, all Jews were allowed to leave Germany and resettle in Palestine with a large part of their assets being allowed to be transferred to Palestine in the process.
Since Rigg the "historian" is a Jew, one cannot expect him to tell the whole story, at least not that part of the story which will jeopardize the Holocaust allegations against Germany and Germans.
Here we start:
Rigg can tell us that ever since the early days of the Prussian army there were Jews fighting for Germany. So what! If a person lives in a country, or has a nationality of a country, one must expect that person to defend that country if the country is attacked or at war. I can't see any heroism from the side of the Jews, for defending Germany in any war, as long as that Jew lived in Germany, and had the rights of any German.
Rigg the Jew, tells us -- and that is important -- that some 150,000 Mischlinge were fighting for Germany during WW2. From this, I understand that Germany did not want to exterminate all Jews within their realm. So all the stories about the cruelty of the German administration towards Jews are fat Jewish lies.
After the German National Socialist Labour Party came to power and started to rebuild Germany, a lot of people living in Germany had to show documents they were of German blood, "Deutschblütigkeitserklärungen".
Rigg, the Jew, describes how prior to 1939, some of the Mischlinge became patriotic, after they heard Hitler speak or read what he had said.
Looking back at the definition on top of this article it must have been the German blood in those Mischlinge that made them feel patriotism in their veins, not the Jewish blood.
The Jewish blood in Rigg does not stop him from telling Jewish lies. He claims many Jews received a document signed by Hitler stating they were Aryan. A big fat lie -- if you ask me. Anyone who has worked in any large organisation knows the project leader does not have time to look after small and trivial things. And to sign any documents regarding the blood of any person must be seen as a trivial thing in a country with over 6 million unemployed and which was fighting for its survival. Even prior to 1939, Germany was fighting for its survival.
Hitler was the leader, and I am convinced he had some senior executive officer who stamped his name on documents of less importance. I don't think Ariel Sharon personally signs all documents needed to kill a Palestinian on the Westbank either. But the lie found on page 47, which I am about to quote, is his biggest. "Karl-Heinz Loewy, raised in a religious home, hid his Jewishness and was drafted into the Waffen-SS and served as a Sturmmann, private (under the assumed name of Walter Grenacher). He feels it was by God's grace that he survived the war." A historian knows that the Waffen-SS was an army of volunteers and nobody was drafted into such an army. There were a lot of documents to be filed and checked before one could join the Waffen-SS. Any false documents would have been discovered and Karl-Heinz would have been sent home.
The Jew Rigg, also - as is his duty as a Jew - tells us about the Wannsee Conference. But Rigg tells us about two conferences. Until, I read this book, I had only heard about the conference of January 20, 1942. Rigg tells us not only about that one, but also of one on March 6, 1942 (page 148). The reason why Rigg mentions two conferences while all my books only tell of one, must be that the Jews after WW2, "found" two different documents from the same conference, and said they were both originals. Regarding Wannsee, the Jew Rigg should have spoken with his fellow Jew, professor Yehuda Bauer, who has said the conference at Wannsee was of NO significance, but then again, Bauer has read some of what the revisionists have dug up regarding Jewish lies after WW2.
Rigg tells us about many Mischlinge who were given military awards for bravery during WW2. So what! One must expect bravery from every soldier in a war. Since Rigg mentions the bravery of Mischlinge specifically, I can only think that bravery mustn't be an intrinsic characteristic of Jews.
According to Rigg, a change in the condition for some Mischlinge occurred after June 1942. Some of them were not sent to the front, but assigned to work details for Organization Todt, OT. If some Jews were assigned to work with the Todt Organization, and sent back to Germany, as Rigg says, those Jews should be happy. The possibility of surviving the war was far larger inside Germany than at the front. Or did Rigg expect Hitler and Germany to be like the horny bastard King David, who sent Uriah to the front to be killed because King David wanted to have sex with Beth-sheba? When talking about King David, one must know that Uriah was a Hittite and not a Jew. From this we learn that a horny Jewish king behaved differently and more cruelly than did a German statesman.
As Germany was forced to attack Russia before the Soviet hordes overran Eastern Europe, the German leadership realized that some of the Mischlinge could not be trusted at the front. Even some Germans were not trusted and were sent back to work with the Todt Organization. We must understand that by then, June 1941, the International Jews had been at war with Germany for almost 9.5 years - the Soviet Union was run by Jews and the chief Jew in Britain, Churchill, had gathered all the Jewish power in his hands. He had even been given help to fight Germany by another Jew, FDR in the USA. No wonder Germany did not trust all its Jewish soldiers.
Those Jews that were not sent back from the front got a stamp in their service book, the Wehrpass, "n.z.v." (nicht zu verwenden - not to be used). In other service books the Germans wrote wehrunwuerdig - unworthy of service. If the Germans wrote or stamped the service books of Jews, just noted, they had their reasons. And I think you can find some of those above.
I am surprised Rigg does not tell about all the rabbis who lived in Germany during WW2. I am also surprised he does not tell what these rabbis told the Mischlinge regarding the ongoing war. At least the above named Karl-Heinz must have spoken to a rabbi before he joined the army. Karl-Heinz was brought up in a religious home, as you remember.
Yes, he tells about the Holocaust. Had he, Rigg, not done that he would not have been a Jew. But he does not tell about the alleged crematories at Auschwitz nor about the alleged gassing at Treblinka or any other concentration camps. What he says is that none of the Mischlinge knew anything about the killing of Jews during WW2. They have had letters from home telling them that some of their relatives had passed away, but nothing about any gassing. We even learn that a Jew visited his father in Sachsenhausen concentration camp.
Rigg bases his book on interviews with Mischlinge who lived in Germany and fought for Germany during WW2, but he also uses from books mostly written by Jews. When it comes to the Holocaust he cannot show us one single Jew who ever visited a relative at Auschwitz, Treblinka, Belzec or any of the so-called death camps in Poland. One would expect that among 150,000 Jews at least one would have visited a relative in the Auschwitz system of camps, but no. Let us now see what explanation Rigg gives for Mischlinge not knowing what happened (page 250): The cause of the denial or ignorance (or both) of Falkenberg, Maltzahn, Metz, and Lennert of the atrocities committed against their loved ones could have stemmed from their disbelief or lack of understanding of the mechanism of death operating under Hitler. I have another explanation: It never happened. But one cannot expect -- or can one? -- a Jew to see what everybody else sees. Had Rigg written that there were no gassings he would not have been a Jew.
The fact that Mischlinge were fighting in the German army has been known, among Germans, for a long time. But it hasn't been comme il faut to write about it. (I hope you understand some French.) With over 150,000 Mischlinge in the Wehrmacht, a lot of Germans knew the truth. The various Jewish organisations have known Germans knew this. They suddenly found the time ripe to commit the facts to print and selected the Jew Rigg to tell the story. The many Jewish organisations knew that sooner or later a German historian or even an English one would write the story about the Mischlinge. That story, written by a gentile, would have looked different from the story told by a Jew. Each and every historian who now will write about the Mischlinge will have to base his story on the work laid down by the Jew Rigg. The Oberjuden are stupid, but not that stupid. They wanted a Jew to be the one to tell the story first. Then they can always say: "Look, we told you about the Mischlinge, didn't we? Why not believe us?"
If you look at the Notes to the book they are all from Jewish writers. Look at the people he thanks for the help, mainly Jewish organisations.
So what did Rigg do? He interviewed a few Jews, copied a few books and that is all. Anyone can do that. The Oberjuden told him who to interview, which books to use as reference and where to look for background to the book.
If Rigg had worked as a historian he would have looked for original documents, he shows us none. He shows a few pictures, so what. He should have showed us copies of the various political documents stating what he says regarding Hitler's politics on the Mischlinge. There are no such documents in the book. If Hitler must have signed many documents regarding allowing Mischlinge to be Aryans, why didn't Rigg show us one single document with Hitler's signature were Hitler says this Jew is a German???? He only says Hitler signed such documents. Regarding the document on page 173, Deutschblütigkeit des Ernst Prager: Did Hitler knew Prager was a Mischling???? The document does not say anything about that. On page 80 we learn that Prager discussed his being partly Jew with his superior, General Blomberg, in June 1933. Blomberg said this, Prager¹s Jewish descent, was no problem. As far as I remember, General Blomberg, was discharged without honour from the army in 1936. Such a man cannot be trusted. Blomberg married a prostitute, he asked Hitler to attend the wedding, and was told to leave the army in 1936. Such a man would never have told Hitler or anybody anything.
Regarding quarter Jew Hans Sander's letter from Hitler: What does the letter contain? It only said that Sander, a member of the SA, can keep his rank and rights, nothing else. Sander had been a party member for a long time. Should he not be allowed to have his privileges? Hitler was not a Jew, he said you have been OK to the party, so I am OK to you. What was the SA? A party-police which kept peace during meetings. The letter is dated 1933. As the going got tougher many of the Mischlinge were discharged from the Wehrmacht in 1940.
The German leadership felt they could not trust all the Mischlinge. I hope you agree with me that during a war both the political and military leadership of a country must be able to trust their citizens.
I see no reason to quote any more from the book, neither do I see any reason for going into details on other topics Rigg takes up in his book. To me the book is just another piece of Jewish shit written about Germany and Hitler.
Neither do I see any value in the book besides that it tells us that Hitler allowed Jews to serve in the German Army, the Wehrmacht, during WW2. By itself that is not new information: we knew that and we did not need a Jew to tell us that.
This book is a book which tries to say the Jews were good Germans who were treated badly by Hitler.
If Jewish audacity and swindle, Chutzpah, is a fact, then resistance must be a national duty.
Heil og sael
No comments:
Post a Comment