THE TALMUDIC AND THE TARGUM BASIS TO THE TWO
SEEDLINE THEORY. IN THEIR OWN WORDS!!
Required Reading for all Two
Seedline Promoters!
It is clear that the theory of the two
seedline was a common teaching by the old Rabbi's of Judaism. Consider these
extractions from their Talmud and Targums and Encyclopedia's to validate the
origins of this perverted theory! Consider:
Yebamoth 103b--Rabbi Johanan
stated: "When the serpent copulated with Eve, he infused her with lust."
Haye Sarah 126a --Another Rabbi
states: "Thus I have learnt, that when the serpent had intercourse with Eve
he injected defilement into her."
Haye Sarah 126b--Another
stated: "You rightly said that when the serpent had carnal intercourse with
Eve he injected into her defilement."
Yevamot 103b--"According to the
midrash, the snake seduced her to commit adultery with him. Thus a thrice
repeated saying of Rabbi Yohanan has it that 'at the time that the snake had
intercourse with Eve, he introduced filth into her..."
Ahare Moth 76b--One Rabbinic
source stated: "Eve bore Cain from the filth of the serpent, and therefore
from him were descended all the wicked generations, and from his side is the
abode of spirits and demons."
Bereshith 36b--"For two beings
had intercourse with Eve, and she conceived both and bore two children. Each
followed one of the male parents, to this side and one to the other, and
similarly their characters."
Shabbath 146a--"For when the
serpent came upon Eve he injected lust into her."
Yevamot 103b--"...at the time
that the snake had intercourse with Eve, he introduced filth into her.
Zohar I, 28b--"For they are the
children of the ancient serpent which seduced Eve..."
Targum Pseudo-Jonathan--"Adam
knew about his wife Eve that she had conceived by Sammael the angel of the
Lord, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Cain."
Jewish Encyc.1904-Vol.9.p.70--"The
chief functions fo Satan are, as already noted, those of temptation,
accusation, and punishment. He was an active agent in the fall of man(Pirke
R.El.Xii.) and was the father of Cain."
Jewish Encyc.1904-Vol.5,p.275-"Eve
became pregnant, and bore Cain and Abel on the very day of (her creation
and) expulsion from Eden (Gen.R.xii) Cain's real father was not Adam, but
one of the demons..."
Pirqei de Rabbi Eliezer: "The
serpent came into her and she became pregnant with Cain, as it says, "And
the man knew his wife Eve."What did he know" That she was already
pregnant.(by Satan.)
Targum of Jonathan--"And Adam
was aware that Eve his wife had conceived from Sammael the angel, and she
became pregnant and bare Cain, and he was like those on high, not like those
below; and she said, 'I have acquired a man, the angel of the Lord."
Jerusalem Targum--"And Adam
knew his wife, who had desired the Angel; and she conceived, and bare Cain;
and she said, I have acquired a man, the Angel of the Lord. And she added to
bear from her husband Adamhis twin, even Abel."
The Encycl.Britannica
Vol.VIII-1910.p.122 (Jewish Interpretations of Scripture) "The birth of
Cain is ascribed to a union of Satan with Eve."
Jewish Encycl.1905.Vol.XI p.69--"Satan
was the seducer and paramour of Eve."
Legends of the Bible-Louis
Ginsberg,p.54-"Satan, in the guise of the serpent, approached her and
the fruit of their union was Cain, the ancestor of all impious generations
that were rebellious toward God, and rose up against Him. Cain's descent
from Satan, who is the angel Sammael, was revealed in his seraphic
appearance. At his birth, the exclamation was wrung from Eve, 'I have gotten
a man, through an angel of the Lord."
OTHER SOURCES:
Identity Bible Reference Manual
Vol.II-Rev. G.Udvary--We believe that there is not one, but two fathers
to the human race and that Satan sired children bringing them into this
world through the seedline of Cain.(Matt.13:38, 1 John 3:10) These people
are eternal enemies of the household of Yahweh."
The Curse of Canaan - Eustace
Mullins,pp3,5,35--"...Satan...was the serpent who entered into and seduced
Eve, producing the first murderer, Cain."
"The prince of darkness had a number
of disguises, but when he incarnated sexual desire, as he did for Eve, he
always appeared as a serpent."
"...God accepted the offering from
Abel, but rejected the offering of Cain because he was untrustworthy, the
is, he was of the serpent."
Last Battle Cry, Jarah
B.Crawford.pp.333-334, 337,4-5--"Cain's father was Satan: Abel's father
was Adam. Eve had conceived in the garden with Satan. She conceived again in
4:1 with Adam. If Cain and Abel were twins, then Eve's pregnancy carried two
conceptions."
"...The Jews, were of mixed blood;
they were half-breeds...This is why Jesus could acknowledge that they were
of Abraham's seed, because on one side of their ancestry they could actually
trace their lineage back to Abraham. But on the other side of their ancestry
Jesus traced it back to the devil himself."
Comment:
In light of these facts, it can be
seen that these Jewish inspired interpretations as applied to these
chapters of Genesis resulted from failing to observe the very basic
interpretation for it was based not on the loose translation of the minor
and secondary meaning ofthe words selected, but most importantly the
meanings were taken out of context. No credence, therefore, could be given
to it.
The picture conjured up by this false
interpretation truly is saddening, for it dengrated Eve who, it was decreed,
was to become the Mother of all in whom was Life or Life-Giver. For while
Adam and Eve's condition was now one of death, through Eve alone could
natural life continue. But more significantly, by Woman alone was to come
the "promised seed" which was to "bruise the serpents head".
This promised seed of woman
anticipated a Deliverer, the Messiah, the Redeemer of Israel for Woman does
not carry a physical seed any more than does a Satan, as an implied spirit
being, have a physical seed!..
By this pronouncement and the fact
that God has, throughout the ages, chosen women of the highest purity and
character to be instruments in the carrying out of His purpose here on earth
(and has protected them on occasion to insure that purity) it is
inconceivable that Eve could be considered to be any less than Sarah,
Rebekah, Rachel or Ruth. No, not under any circumstances would Eve have been
the woman portrayed by this erroneous interpetation.!!!
Thanks for Listening!
J. Richard Niemela.
Return to Top of Other Topics
No comments:
Post a Comment