CITYBLOGGER..PENAFIAN Laman ini tidak bertanggungjawab atas hasil penulisan yang dipetik dari sumbe

If those who own the US cared about protecting civilians, they'd have taken action in Rwanda, as millions were slaughtered

Rwanda has no oil and so it was not of interest to the NWO
You never heard about al-Qaeda, before 9/11 and that's because it was invented to explain who the enemy was

It's a total fabrication and deep research shows that all terrorist events are done by the CIA for the purpose of gathering support for the anti-terrorist cause

If there ever was a war on terrorism, the CIA would be abolished, as the root cause

Invading sovereign nations, without just cause doesn't help, eitherObama's Libya strategy:

A)Jump in up front with lots of well written propaganda speeches about "protecting civilians", etc.
B)Get out of the way [go campaign!] and let the propaganda machine take over.
.
If it goes well, the propaganda media will praise and laud Obama for "preventing millions" of civilian deaths and not getting involved in a "needless, protracted war", etc.
.
If it goes sour ... (It did!) ... the propaganda machine will stay mum about Obama and focus on popular distractions like ... Palin, Trump, and movie stars.
(Later, Obama will be able to say, "IF NATO had only followed my lead ...)
.
Anybody find Obama's name in the above article?
Anybody surprised that 100 rockets into a crowded city cause only 5 civilian deaths?
Anybody believe that line which says NATO "has kept the rebels from being defeated on the battlefield"?
Anybody wanna bet if it continues to go sour, that in a week or two we will be told that the "rebels" are really al-quada forces and need to be defeated?

Know why?