Whatever Hit The Pentagon Was Not A Passenger Airliner
A 757 airliner has about 200 seats, which are designed to support
and protect the passengers in a crash that generates deceleration
forces of up to 16 times the force of gravity (16Gs) -- 4800 pounds
for a 300 lb passenger. They have heavy metal frames under the
upholstery.
These seats are mounted throughout nearly the entire length of the
fuselage. Yet not one single passenger seat was photographed either
inside or outside the Pentagon after the event. They could not have
melted, because there was not a great deal of fire -- the photos
show intact books and other burnable objects that would have been
destroyed at temperatures far lower than those required to melt
aluminum alloy or steel seat frames. In fact, there was not nearly
enough metal debris in general, inside or outside the building,
to account for a 100,000 lb airplane.
Also, the neat round exit hole that the government said was punched
by the nose of the 757 could not possibly have been. The nose is made
of fiberglass to permit transmission and reception of the waves from
the radar apparatus inside it. The diagram of the Pentagon damage
made by the American Society of Civil Engineers shows many intact
steel-reinforced concrete columns between the impact area and the
exit hole. The plastic nose could not have passed through or around
these columns. When this was pointed out, the government changed its
story and said that the hole was made by a backhoe. As the hole is
perfectly round, this is also impossible. One or more loops of explosive
detcord (primacord) fastened to the inside of the wall would probably
have made a nice round hole.
See the photographic evidence here: http://www.pentagonresearch.com/index.html
|
Why Jared Israel Is Attacking Scott Ritter
And Deceiving The 9-11 Truth Movement |
|
By Mark S. Bilk
|
I present evidence here that Jared Israel has many lies on his own website, which have the purpose of covering up the role of the state of Israel in perpetrating the war on Iraq by proxy via the Bush administration neocons (as well as covering up and justifying Israel's mass robbery, torture, and murder of the Palestinians). In fact, most of his home page, and much of his entire website, is now devoted to lying propaganda on behalf of the state of Israel, rather than information about 9-11 and Yugoslavia. To put it simply, Jared Israel is a total zionist.
And Scott Ritter has voiced many criticisms of the state of Israel, thus providing a backer of Israel, such as Jared, with many motives for attacking him:
1. Ritter tried to stop the U.S. from attacking Iraq (while the state of Israel wanted the attack to happen), by exposing the "evidence" of Iraqi "weapons of mass destruction" (WMD) as false.
2. He criticized Israel for its role in *providing* false evidence of WMD in Iraq.
3. He criticized the neocons for their close ties to Israel, putting the good of that nation ahead of the interests of the U.S.
4. He criticized the neocons for sending U.S. soldiers to die to protect Israel, saying this is "a travesty".
5. He criticized the idea of a "Greater Israel" — the zionist goal of annexing large sections of the nations around it.
6. He criticized the Israeli government for instructing its citizens to open the seals on their gas masks when the attack on Iraq began, even though it knew that Iraq had no WMD. This act of propaganda cost Israel billions, because the masks or the absorbent substances in them will now have to be replaced.
It therefore appears very likely that Jared Israel's extreme hostility toward Scott Ritter, and his attempt to pressure the New York 9-11 truth movement into dropping Ritter from its upcoming public presentation, is an attempt to discredit Ritter and to fraudulently invalidate his criticisms of the state of Israel. And this is why Jared Israel is willing to *sabotage* the breakthrough of 9-11 information into the antiwar movement as brought in by Scott Ritter, which is the all-important step for spreading the information widely and thus stopping the bogus "War on Terror" — actually an eternal war of world conquest with its Nazi police state, mass murder attacks on many nations and possible nuclear war.
Furthermore, there have been recent reports that the U.S. has been secretly moving old "weapons of mass destruction" (chemical or biological) into Iraq, with the intention of "discovering" them, to serve as a pretext for extending the U.S. war of mass murder and wreckage of Iraq's infrastructure. This would continue to be largely on behalf of the state of Israel, which wants Iraq destroyed to the point where it is no longer a modern technological nation. And who would be the public figure with the greatest experience and authority to debunk this "discovery" and prove that the weapons had been planted, thus thwarting the intentions of the state of Israel? None other than Scott Ritter!
An important part of solving any crime is knowing who had the motive — who benefits — cui bono, because they are the natural suspects. Israel has used 9-11 as an excuse to greatly intensify its attacks on the Palestinians (whom it has long called "terrorists"), and as the means to attack Iraq (by proxy, using the zionist neocons).
Yet, contrary to a great deal of evidence, Jared Israel denies that the Israeli government wants to get rid of the Palestinians, denies that Israel wants Iraq destroyed, and denies that the neocons are backers of Israel (zionists). Thus, despite his reputation as one of the first 9-11 researchers, Jared Israel is now trying to deceive the 9-11 truth movement, and the world, about these very important aspects of the motivation for 9-11. And the fact that these *were* motivations for 9-11 is proven conclusively by one single piece of evidence — the "dancing Israelis", the Mossad agents that were seen filming the attack and collapse of the WTC towers and dancing with glee. This proves that the state of Israel had planned to benefit from 9-11 *before* it happened.
For Jared Israel, a 9-11 researcher, to lie about some of the motives for 9-11, and thus try to divert attention away from some of the likely perpetrators of the crime, is an extremely harmful action — a betrayal that is far worse than anything he has accused Scott Ritter of doing. It means that Jared Israel cannot be trusted to speak truthfully about any aspect of 9-11 or current events that even remotely involves the state of Israel.
A. The concise history of Palestine, zionism and Israel.
B. Jared Israel's lies in support of the state of Israel.
C. The close alliance between the Neocons and the hardline zionist Likud government of the state of Israel.
D. The Israeli government's wish that Iraq be attacked and its assistance in providing false evidence of Iraqi WMD. The Neocons' intention to attack Iraq on behalf of Israel.
E. The Neocons' intention to attack Syria on behalf of Israel.
F. Statements by Scott Ritter critical of Israel.
No comments:
Post a Comment