Who's the Bully? Manitoba Forces Homosexuality on
Children
December 5, 2012
School Bully, Nancy Allan
Manitoba Minister of Re Education
&
Child Procurement
Social Engineering; Political &
Religious Oppression
Tuesday, Nancy Allan announced a
coercive plan to persecute students who object to homosexuality, ensuring that
school children are groomed for homosexual pedophiles.
The "Anti Bullying Action
Plan" will teach children how to report anyone who has reservations about
homosexuality. This has been extended beyond the school to include all
venues, including the Internet and social media in particular. There will
be political commissars trained to take complaints and hunt down and intimidate
offenders. (Source: CBC Information Radio
Interview with Allan)
All school boards will be forced to
adopt a "Human Diversity" Mission Statement which emphasizes
"inclusiveness" i.e. approval for the "homosexual
lifestyle." It will insist that "gay-straight alliances" be
established in all Manitoba schools. These clubs are meeting places where
straight children can be inverted and have their first gay sexual experience.
These trysting places have been established in 31 Manitoba schools so far.
The Illuminati always have a good
reason and the real reason. They talk about making schools
"safe" and "friendly" for gays. The real reason is
to encourage gay sexual experimentation. Manitoba schools are no longer
"safe" places for the 98% of the school population that is
heterosexual. Our political leaders demonstrate a subversive hatred for
heterosexual society and its institutions.
Manitoba's NDP government is a
member of the Socialist International, a Communist (Illuminati
Masonic) front. Fist and red rose are both Communist front symbols. The
Illuminati have crossed the line. They have been caught red
handed procuring children for pedophiles. They are gambling the
public is too stupid and cowardly to recognize this and resist.
Nancy Allan Email-- minedu@leg.gov.mb.ca
"We must introduce into their
education all those principles which have so brilliantly broken up their
order." Protocols of the Elders of Zion (16)
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
You know it's an Illuminati psy-op when local, state and federal governments, corporations, celebrities and the mass media all start singing from the same songbook.
The "psy-op" is "bullying." Supposedly it's an epidemic. The Obama administration "estimates that bullying affects 13 million students, or about a third of those attending school."
One-third of all children attending school? Have you ever heard such nonsense in your life?
Back in the 1950's I was bullied in the schoolyard at Fairfield school. I didn't go whinging on YouTube for government, public or celebrity assistance.
I hired a tough kid named Louis Knapp and he took care of the problem. It cost me some marbles.
Some kids ostracized me in later grades. So what? I shunned them. Personality conflicts and disagreements do not require legislation.
BULLYING IS CODEWORD
But "Bullying" is not the
real issue here. "Bullying" is a euphemism for something else,
non-acceptance of homosexuality.
Gay kids are being portrayed as a persecuted minority. Anyone who takes exception to the media and government drive to make us all experiment with homosexuality is being set up as a "bully" or "hater."
"Lady" Gag wants to make "bullying" a "hate crime." Anyone who turns down a gay sexual overture will be suspected of "hate." Did you know most homosexuals prefer heterosexuals? They don't like rejection.
Watch the report on ABC News Dec. 6 2011. It was about how satanist slut Lady Gag is going to the White House to discuss bullying. But it quickly emerges that bullying isn't the problem, resistance to homosexuality is.
Jonah Mowry's video is
trotted out and Jonah is quoted as saying Gaga inspired him because of her
"born that way" campaign.Earth to Jonah. Very few homosexuals are "born that way." Most become that way because of family dysfunction (abusive or no father, overbearing mother) or sexual abuse by an older member of the same sex.
[ A reader Kevin (see comments) used to live in San Francisco and asked gay men questions like "Were you always attracted to men?" EVERY LAST GAY MALE HE SPOKE TO HAD BEEN either abused by his father or (more likely) step-father or raped by a person in authority; all while either young or teenaged children.]
This dysfunction is what the Illuminati perverts are trying to normalize. This is why they give shots against STD's to babies and children.
Don't have any illusions about the monsters who govern us. They are practicing satanists. They don't care about gays, women, children, or anyone but themselves. But they will adopt a pious pose to advance their pernicious agenda.
I believe homosexuality is a developmental disorder and gays should be treated like anyone else with a health challenge, with compassion and support. I do not encourage or condone hurtful behavior.
Read my article "It's OK to Say 'That's So Gay'" for the big picture.
Don't be fooled. "Bullying" is really about heterosexuals being coerced to have gay sex. Bullying is the media and government perverts and traitors bullying you.
--
Note- Jonah Mowray admits his video was a hoax.
Canada a "Disneyland for
Pedophiles" says hockey star
Related -Makow - "Is this Gay Behavior Sick?"
Related -Makow - "Is this Gay Behavior Sick?"
------------------------- Lori Douglas Scandal Unveils
Manitoba Masonic Underground
Related- Another psy-op, Makow- "Domestic Violence Hysteria is Political"
Related- Another psy-op, Makow- "Domestic Violence Hysteria is Political"
First Comment by Judith Reisman
Ph.D. author of Sexual Sabotage
Recently Henry Makow
published an article entitled, "Nancy Allan announced a coercive plan to
persecute students who object to homosexuality, ensuring that school children
are groomed for homosexual pedophiles."
This is a wholly
accurate account of the state mandated pedophile/pederast grooming increasingly
found worldwide. Only a worldwide institution could produce the same global
sexual "party line." The campaign to sexualize all infants and
children for use and abuse emerges as an "Anti
Bullying Action Plan" in Manitoba. The program induces
child sexual experimentation--the same encouraged by Havana-trained sexologists
in Brazil, and similar pedo-advocates in Great Britain, the USA and worldwide
under the closet umbrella of International Planned Parenthood.
Makow says,
"Don't be fooled. "Bullying" is really about heterosexuals being
coerced to have gay sex. Bullying is the media and government perverts and
traitors bullying you." I'd add, these programs are entry level
for the child sexual traffic--a financial growth industry. Picture
perverts sitting around a conference table for the last 20 years planning how
to, "get the kids away from the controls of parents and religion and they
are wholly vulnerable. Let's call it anti bullying, hate crimes. Once we get
pedo-grooming--we get global control."
Rediculous you say?
Time is telling us it is so.
Visiting Professor of
Law, Liberty University School of Law
Comments
for "Who's the Bully? Manitoba Forces Homosexuality on Children"
D
said (December 6, 2012):
Once again , great article but what
do we do? people are so indoctrinated . They're pushing this Bullying crap in
my work place , if you have a conversation with someone and they don't like
your
position you can be written up even if someone overhears something in passing , it's getting really weird out there. This is not only gay it is retarded and gay ----I just sing to myself and talk about the weather . take care.
position you can be written up even if someone overhears something in passing , it's getting really weird out there. This is not only gay it is retarded and gay ----I just sing to myself and talk about the weather . take care.
Al Thompson said (December 5, 2012):
One of the components of this farce is the idea that a person is "born that way." I don't believe that is true, and that homosexuality, along with
fornication is simply a bad choice of behavior.
Tony Blizzard said (December 5, 2012):
It's way past time for people to
stand up for decency and reject this "hate" bullshit by loudly
proclaiming that they do and always will hate what is evil and no one is going
to be allowed to put a stop to this necessary-for-survival discrimination
against evil.
If government has become so corrupt
it cannot discern evil from good then it is high time to dissolve or change that
government by refusal to recognize it as legitimate.
Everyone discriminates every last
time he/she makes ANY KIND OF A DECISION. It is a pure bullshit misuse of the
language to think anyone has the right to not allow people to discriminate,
that is, decide as they see fit, so long as their discrimination does not
result in ACTUAL and unavoidable harm to others.
Even if society at large doesn't
like the use that person puts to discrimination. It's his business, no one
else's. If he is wrong he will suffer the NATURAL consequences. There is no
need whatsoever for government to interject itself into the picture other than
through TRUE (criminal) harm, i.e., normal lawsuits in regular courts for
discrimination outside the dictates of normal, proper law. Such laws will be
predicated on fairness to all parties, not on officially proclaimed
"hatred" as crime. That muck is simply a means to stop normal
behavior for purposes of advancement of an agenda which no one of proper
thinking desires.
Hate is an emotion, not an act. Only
a harmful act can be criminal, whether or not hate is involved.
"Sticks and stones can break my
bones but names can never hurt me." Plain truth as old as mankind.
No worldly government amounts to
God, including courts which are bound to make decisions by law, right or wrong.
A wrong law is negated by the mass
of people refusing to obey it. This has been what works down through history.
Joe said (December 11, 2011):
Henry actually I put to the test the
"bullying" rules after sitting in on a seminar explain the dynamics
of bullying, and what I found out was that the school where I work doesn't
really have a policy for the EMPLOYEESS who work in the schools.
As a result I used a "bullying" charge against a FEMALE employee who happens to be my own union representative but also the "teachers pet" of the School officials. I learned one thing, real bullying, using a position to harass and show disrespect for workmates and doing acts of "sabotage" or immature unprofessional, intimidating behavior, making oneself above the law or what we call an "untouchable" over a period of time, not just one act, doesn't work when you charge the "teachers pet" of the charge.
As a result I am supposed to be suspended without pay starting Dec 19, 2011 for five days.
Don't worry though I am also using their own rules to fight the charges against me.
"RETALIATION against a person who reports bullying, provides information during an investigation or witnesses or has reliable information about bullying shall be prohibited"
In other words, Bullying is really politics when you accuse the wrong person of the charge.......
As a result I used a "bullying" charge against a FEMALE employee who happens to be my own union representative but also the "teachers pet" of the School officials. I learned one thing, real bullying, using a position to harass and show disrespect for workmates and doing acts of "sabotage" or immature unprofessional, intimidating behavior, making oneself above the law or what we call an "untouchable" over a period of time, not just one act, doesn't work when you charge the "teachers pet" of the charge.
As a result I am supposed to be suspended without pay starting Dec 19, 2011 for five days.
Don't worry though I am also using their own rules to fight the charges against me.
"RETALIATION against a person who reports bullying, provides information during an investigation or witnesses or has reliable information about bullying shall be prohibited"
In other words, Bullying is really politics when you accuse the wrong person of the charge.......
Jason said (December 8, 2011):
Totally agree with the overall
statement of the article but I think the “bullying” issue goes even beyond the
homosexual tolerance agenda. It’s an agenda within agendas; an entire
itinerary.
It has several agendas deep within
the construct of limiting “bullying” in schools and society.
The overall summary of this overall
agenda is to use the educational system to indoctrinate young adults to become
acclimated to a coming politically correct society; this inherently having a
domino effect in which breeds weaklings, both men and women alike.
Some of the other agendas also
include undermining personal responsibility and the moral value of courtesy,
respect, and manners for your peers. (I.e. a snitch rarely earns any respect)
Lastly, bullies or problem children
are subject to be seized by Child Services; this implying the State owns the
children and not their parents; this intertwining the agendas of breaking up
family in cultural society; also a part in the Protocols.
The education system is an entity
for spewing propaganda. It’s corrupted and it’s grooming children for a world
of societal domination and oppression. It’s an indoctrination machine that
drastically needs to be reformed before our children are so deluded; there will
be no bringing them back.
A
said (December 8, 2011):
Your last article about bullying is
so true. My son and daughter are considered Homophobes and intolerant at school
because they both said they don't agree with homosexuality
even though they clearly stated they had nothing against the person/people and would always be respectful and kind to everyone. One of my daughter's friends is gay and surprisingly he is the one who accepts Annie's right to her opinion.
even though they clearly stated they had nothing against the person/people and would always be respectful and kind to everyone. One of my daughter's friends is gay and surprisingly he is the one who accepts Annie's right to her opinion.
MS
said (December 8, 2011):
I was raised in dancing and music
school, and knew several gay boys from kindergarten on up to when they were
successful career men (one, an R.C. priest, one a well-known harpist who
entertained many times at the White house, one a dancer who founded a
world-famous ballet company. These people ware gay from a very early age. And
then I knew more gay people when I grew up. I think they were born that way,
probably from the testosterone imbalance you mentioned to Michelle. They were
sick. And indeed all but the priest died of AIDS. It seems so unfair that boys
who were born defective had to grow up and get clobbered by AIDS.
This is a disability which is NOT
appreciated or coddled (well, except by the mistaken gay rights people who want
to say gay is normal).
I am a person born with a genetic
defect that I told you about, that made my life hell. I have spoken to several
gay men, particularly my rector in another town,
telling him that his condition was an illness like mine. I can speak to these people because my genes made me weird too. I empathize greatly with them. I am not gay and had a wonderful heterosexual marriage, but I have had gay friends primarily because I was in the "arts". And I know they really tried. Two of them wanted to marry me. They really wanted to change. They really couldn't.
telling him that his condition was an illness like mine. I can speak to these people because my genes made me weird too. I empathize greatly with them. I am not gay and had a wonderful heterosexual marriage, but I have had gay friends primarily because I was in the "arts". And I know they really tried. Two of them wanted to marry me. They really wanted to change. They really couldn't.
With tears,
Victoria said (December 7, 2011):
ust to address the issue of bullying
- what has struck me is that, until we get rid of adults bullying other adults
because of government sanction to do so (police, tax people, census, licensing
etc. etc. etc.), we will never see the end of kids doing the same to one
another. It's a pecking order and whoever is lowest man on the totem pole has
the most damage inflicted on them. As with refusing to allow kids to play with
guns, isn't it nice that we adults expect children to set the example of
repudiating bullying and guns (drugs, extramarital sex etc. etc.) while we
adults have a free pass to indulge ourselves?
To me, the whole problem is
systemic. Until we take the power of coercion away from government and
therefore, police, (except in extreme examples where someone is going to hurt
someone else physically) we will continue to have issues that get increasingly
bitter. Here's a clip from a man named Dean Clifford who, right in the first
few minutes, very succinctly describes why so many of us are feeling under
pressure in this day and age:
Scott said (December 7, 2011):
Your current piece on bullying is
VERY timely! Just last week, a decision came down from the school board (near
Buffalo) on Jamey Rodemeyer. Law enforcement was involved with the
investigation (just like you said). Lady GaGa was all over this one, too
(again, like you said). It turns out that the students, who tormented Jamey,
were only found to have called him "faggot" and shoved him in the
halls at school. Keep in mind that some of these were girls. This is no
different than what took place generations before. What is different is the
social media. Nobody can condone verbal and online comments telling him to kill
himself. The end result is that these students will receive about a week's
suspension. Pressure was on for treating them as adults with criminal action.
When this first happened, the outcry was swift and emotional with online venting and candlelight vigils. It's not quite the same, a while later. Part of it is the cool down period, and maybe some are realizing that there was probably more to the story than how it was presented when it occurred.
Let me add before closing, that with the gay rights issue, there's always a trigger event, a lightning rod or sympathetic figure. In '69, there was the Stonewall riot, which wasn't really discussed much until decades later. In the late 70's, Anita Bryant was removed from the public spotlight for relatively tame comments against the lifestyle. In the 80's, there was young Ryan White, who wasn't even homosexual (he was a hemophiliac). He became the "face of AIDS," because parents were fearful at the school he attended (not like the media ever did the best job at educated people about the facts).
When this first happened, the outcry was swift and emotional with online venting and candlelight vigils. It's not quite the same, a while later. Part of it is the cool down period, and maybe some are realizing that there was probably more to the story than how it was presented when it occurred.
Let me add before closing, that with the gay rights issue, there's always a trigger event, a lightning rod or sympathetic figure. In '69, there was the Stonewall riot, which wasn't really discussed much until decades later. In the late 70's, Anita Bryant was removed from the public spotlight for relatively tame comments against the lifestyle. In the 80's, there was young Ryan White, who wasn't even homosexual (he was a hemophiliac). He became the "face of AIDS," because parents were fearful at the school he attended (not like the media ever did the best job at educated people about the facts).
Then, there was Matthew Sheppard
beating death. That crystallized the "hate crime" push, even though
witnesses stated that it was a drug deal gone bad. Meantime, there were the
massive efforts to pass gay marriage through in western countries. Any casual
observer knew that the demands wouldn't end there. Now, it's bullying. James
Rodemeyer and the kid in the video, which you posted, are going to help
galvanize this next phase. The common thread throughout the last several
decades has always been accusations of "intolerance,"
"homophobia" and "bigotry" to attempt to silence any
opposition to the agenda.
Tony B said (December 7, 2011):
The school where I work has
"anti bullying signs" all over the place but they are obviously aimed
at what is said, not what is done. Beside the homo agenda, partly because boys
beating up other boys is now almost non-existent in school. (Actually there are
now more real fights between girls - which are simply broken up - usually no
consequences.)
But for boys it's almost a damned
federal case when there is a school yard fight. Cops all over the damned place.
Immediate suspensions from school, if not worse. The real school vocal bullying
is some (usually woman) teacher calling a kid out of class and coming down on
him like the proverbial shrew. (Actually, the parents should feel blessed with
their kid out of those mind control hell holes.)
Back to real bullying in my youth,
where punches were thrown. In almost every case of a big kid beating up on a
small, defenseless kid there would soon be an even bigger kid beating the crap
out of the bully and leaving him with a statement like "How does it
feel?" That was the end of it. Authorities not consulted or wanted
involved. Justice done and righteousness restored. Common sense. Not weird
governmental bull shit.
I knew a kid who was about the
smallest boy around. Anytime a new kid came to the area he had to fight that
kid or he was "chickenshit." The boy almost always got his ass whipped
but you had to prove yourself to him and then you were his buddy. Today that
would be labeled "bullying."
There were even cases where a little
kid had had enough and he suddenly turned on his tormentor and took him apart.
This resulted in lots of smiles, nothing else, even from the school
authorities.
Anyone who whines about being
bullied when no one has hit him needs his ass kicked in my book. Girls too.
They're natural born back-biters anyway and want to kill another girl one
minute but the next minute the two are hugging buddies. Crazy to get into the
middle of that kind of juvenile social sorting out.
Jim said (December 7, 2011):
Born that way? Probably more correct
phrase would be chemically engineered that way.
They started using BPA plastics in the 1930's (I believe) to line the cans of canned foods. This man made chemical mimics the female hormone estrogen. Add to that 60+ years of birth control pills, 30+ years of having our meats injected with chemicals
mimicking the female hormone estrogen to make them weigh more at the market, also estrogen hormones to control menopause, and almost all food products today being
packaged in plastic wrappers or containers. This turns women into more aggressive beings while turning men into something less then men. Understanding the whys to the out come is the only way we can begin to correct what has been done to mankind.
We all know it is the Illuminati's agenda to go against everything which is natural to men women and the earth.
They started using BPA plastics in the 1930's (I believe) to line the cans of canned foods. This man made chemical mimics the female hormone estrogen. Add to that 60+ years of birth control pills, 30+ years of having our meats injected with chemicals
mimicking the female hormone estrogen to make them weigh more at the market, also estrogen hormones to control menopause, and almost all food products today being
packaged in plastic wrappers or containers. This turns women into more aggressive beings while turning men into something less then men. Understanding the whys to the out come is the only way we can begin to correct what has been done to mankind.
We all know it is the Illuminati's agenda to go against everything which is natural to men women and the earth.
Derek said (December 7, 2011):
Well that's just sad and pathetic.
Bullying is a staple of the playground. I can recall making good friends as a
child after exchanging fists in the school yard.
Srw said (December 7, 2011):
Who in their right moral mind would
ever care about what Lady Gag Gag has to say. Her music and images are in
themselves a hate crime against all my aesthetic sensibilities ... and I have
to look at her satanically inspired, "in-your-face" images pasted all
over the Internet. Isn't that bullying?
Gabriel said (December 7, 2011):
The swiss government (ours) has only
recently initiated
a campaign where primary school toddlers (of selected "testing
ground" cantons) are now receiving sex education at age 7-8;
complete with little dolls that are able to copulate! part of the
itinerary is learning (and being shown!) that "massaging" your
sexual organs is "fun".
a campaign where primary school toddlers (of selected "testing
ground" cantons) are now receiving sex education at age 7-8;
complete with little dolls that are able to copulate! part of the
itinerary is learning (and being shown!) that "massaging" your
sexual organs is "fun".
of course, our little ones now also
learn that being gay is just as
good as being straight - it`s nothing but a "career choice".
only small groups of conservatives and/or christian fundamentalists are protesting at the sex education program; they are without exception portrayed as backwards in the media...
good as being straight - it`s nothing but a "career choice".
only small groups of conservatives and/or christian fundamentalists are protesting at the sex education program; they are without exception portrayed as backwards in the media...
when criticized, local (cantonal)
governments are arguing that
it is precisely this new form of sex education that will counteract
child sex predators; as little children will be "enabled to know and
control their bodies and their own impulses".
it is precisely this new form of sex education that will counteract
child sex predators; as little children will be "enabled to know and
control their bodies and their own impulses".
however, will my knowing that what
uncle john and his colleagues are doing to me is called "gang rape"
and that they are employing a method known as "anal penetration" help
me to cope more positively with the experience? will it be easier to describe
the experience to my child therapist later on?
I seriously doubt that our school
authorities believe that - or that, in fact, that is their true motivation.
Michelle said (December 7, 2011):
Homosexuality is not caused by some
outward dysfunction. my son is gay and he was never abused by anyone. We are
loving parents and that is just the way it is. No big deal.
--
Michelle,
Some boy become gay because of an
imbalance of testosterone in the gestation period. They are a small minority.
h
Gus said (December 7, 2011):
Well, I can accept the 1/3 figure,
as I was bullied in school and knew a lot of other people who were to. Also,
bullying can lead the person who was bullied to do the same to someone else. It
did in my case, but only once and I felt terrible about it after words.
The thing is, while the bullying was
unpleasant for me, I had a strong family to go home to, parents who cared and
talked to me about it. They didn't encourage me to meet violence with violence,
but rather to feel sorry for the person who obviously felt a need to dominate
others
because of insecurities and/or problems in their own life. Mostly though, my older brother saw to it that I was not bullied, as he was an athletic type and quite popular in school. He never bullied anyone, as far as I am aware.
because of insecurities and/or problems in their own life. Mostly though, my older brother saw to it that I was not bullied, as he was an athletic type and quite popular in school. He never bullied anyone, as far as I am aware.
Again though, this was all because
we had a strong family, with a mother and father who loved us enough to teach
us their values. This was where my guilt came from in the one instance where I
bullied someone else as a reaction to my own experience of being bullied. So it
doesn't surprise me that there would be even more kids feeling insecure and
having poor parenting these days, especially with all the single parent
households (mostly single mothers, since fathers have virtually no rights
anymore).
Anyway, I agree with most of the
rest of what you write here. I think gays are becoming more prevalent because
of the combination of single parent (or more often these days, two same sex
parents) households and the encouragement of such behavior by schools and
media. However, I personally have no issue with those who choose this
lifestyle, only with the efforts to push it on others (I also don't believe
that the values of Christianity allow for condemning homosexuality, though
certainly for condemning a promiscuous lifestyle, whether gay or
straight).
straight).
Jeff said (December 7, 2011):
I just finished watching the Jonah
"Bully" video on youtube, which had well over six million views when
I started it, and fifty-two new views and comments before I finished watching
the whole thing. Here's what struck me, if I may:
It certainly is emotional and
effective, and seems to be pulling a lot of heartstrings. But what I was left
with is the impression that only gay men have feelings, and only they deserve
sympathy. Like you, and many others, I was bullied. I was small, I was
different, and my family moved around enough to where as soon as I was
adjusted, I'd have to start all over again in another hostile public school
environment. Nobody felt sorry for me.
My experiences since then with gays
in working and living situations since then have taught me this: they are
aggressive. What you said about them preferring the challenge of a heterosexual
is absolutely true, and no matter how delicately their advances are rejected,
they become insufferable. We've heard the expression, "hell hath no fury
be that of a woman scorned," but in true dramatic fashion, they take it to
a new extreme.
Sentry said (December 7, 2011):
I once had a consulting job for a
customer, which turned out to be a pair of customers. After getting their
property inspection work done, and while obtaining payment for my work,
something stood out. Here were two men, with one apparently in charge of the
checkbook, and the other bickering about how the first was taking care of it.
That proved to me right there, what I suspected from other things. They were
homosexuals.
Here's my point: I saw before me,
two men, both effeminate in
appearance and physical and speech mannerisms, but one observably the 'man' of the couple, and the other observably the 'woman' of the couple.
appearance and physical and speech mannerisms, but one observably the 'man' of the couple, and the other observably the 'woman' of the couple.
And right there I had a watershed
moment of realization:
homosexuality is a 'masterpiece' of mockery by Satan, requiring a
tremendous amount of work. The enemy had to take two males, twist them around in their upbringing, life experience, and minds, until both were homosexual. Quite a feat, for sure, to do that to two men.
homosexuality is a 'masterpiece' of mockery by Satan, requiring a
tremendous amount of work. The enemy had to take two males, twist them around in their upbringing, life experience, and minds, until both were homosexual. Quite a feat, for sure, to do that to two men.
This one overriding purpose is to
mock God, and mock his first human institution, marriage, the core of family
and civilization and the way God wanted Adam and Eve and their descendants to
bring children into the world and raise them up.
After that I began noticing it in
all 'gay' couples. In recent years
as 'gays' and 'lesbians' have conquered churches and states, and
homosexual 'marriage' is their big goal, you can see it in every
'couple' on news video of their rights events and 'marriage' or
'civil' ceremonies.
as 'gays' and 'lesbians' have conquered churches and states, and
homosexual 'marriage' is their big goal, you can see it in every
'couple' on news video of their rights events and 'marriage' or
'civil' ceremonies.
Marcio (Brazil) said (December 7, 2011):
Now, "hate crimes" are the
ones people will be punished for if they dare say anything that our modern
dictators are not willing to hear (the same guys who defend
"diversity", are against censorship and that claim to favor "freedom
of opinion and speech" - of course, as long as you do not disagree with
theirs). Normal people must shut up or else they will be sued and criminally
prosecuted to the fullest extent of law.
I was also a victim of bullying.
Some classmates kept threatening to beat me up for nothing (I looked like a
nerd and I refused to be follow their leader). I had to pull out some knives (2
plus some extra ones - even a very sharp shaving razor - in case they could
take them from me - and make them run away like a barbarian whem they attempted
to surround me. It was an "either kill or get killed" business for
me, who had been raised in semi-feudal values, typical of centuries ago). Funny
now, but scary when I was only 13. Thanks God there was no state intrusion (although
I had asked school officials for help - in vain). At that time, there were no
cry babies screaming against prejudice.
I understand "prejudice"
or "discrimination" are just some kind of normal moral disapproval of
attitudes that are below moral standards of a society - of course, as long as
such "prejudice" or "discrimination" are not expressed in
terms of violence but just some kind of ostracism. Had we been
"prejudiced" enough, there would not have been so many single mothers,
dopes, criminals, homosexuals, youth rebellion and other social deviations.
Marcos said (December 7, 2011):
In Brazil, there is a push to
approve PLC 122, a law that will put in
jail anyone who disapproves gay behavior, even religiously and
philosophically. It is censorship of thought. The major TV station
just started a campaign for it.
jail anyone who disapproves gay behavior, even religiously and
philosophically. It is censorship of thought. The major TV station
just started a campaign for it.
Here most gays (very few) are killed
by other gays, especially in
fights in paid sexual encounters. There is total tolerance of gays in society.
fights in paid sexual encounters. There is total tolerance of gays in society.
However, when gays rape children,
the press never prints the word gay or homosexual. The gay militants want
pedophilia.
They spent millions on a Gay
quasi-porno DVD to be given to 8 year-olds in public schools, teaching them to
be gay. Only heavy public outcry halted the project. If PLC 122 passes, these
things will not be able to be prevented.
Dan said (December 7, 2011):
This just in......
Jonah Mowry "APPARENTLY"
LIED about his "Whats goin on.." video
Andrew said (December 7, 2011):
I was watching American Dad tonight
and it painted anyone that disagrees with homosexuality as a backwards, racist,
and moronic redneck. I've also taken the stance that I'm against homosexuals
and their lifestyle before in discussions with peers. The reaction is stunning.
You just sit their and get insulted. It's truly unbelievable how badly people
have been brainwashed. It's like progressives just turn off their brains and
try to shout down arguments without using any logic at all. People go from
being rational to completely irrational.
Richard said (December 7, 2011):
The 'bullying' op is just another
inversion of reality.
I was in high school in the early
1970's. In seventh, tenth, and twelfth grades 3 different homosexual teachers
attempted to 'seduce' me. The first two, I didn't understand that they were
mentally ill till they made physical contact. Talk about 'socially awkward'.
The modus operandi of these pitiful middle aged men was months of pretending to
be mentors, leading up to a pathetic groping once after all that they'd gotten
me someplace private. In each case my natural reaction was to push them away
saying "get the fuck off me you faggot". Keep in mind I was 13, 15,
and 17 years old and these were homosexual predators in their 40's on the
public school payroll.
My impression from all the
homosexuals I ever knew about is that it's no different than heterosexual
compulsive sex addiction to the extreme of men who stalk women and sexually
harass them.
In the 70's homosexuals were already 'out of the closet', with the weight of the 'sexual revolution' of the drug subculture behind them. I didn't figure out till years later that the reason those homosexual teachers could get away with stalking and harassing minor male students is the school system where I lived, (both states) were controlled by Freemasons. Every school principal was a 32nd degree Mason, often a Shriner to boot. I recall every teacher's car in the parking lot displaying their masonic flash on the rear, so that the cops would know their lodge and rank, whether Blue Lodge or Shriner or Eastern Star.
I didn't understand it then - but I realized later the talks that principals in two states had with me holding me in contempt, informing me that they would 'make a man' of me. Now I believe they'd seen in my private record that I rejected both homosexual seduction and one offer to recruit me into DeMolay (the Freemason's organization for teenage males. Bill Clinton was a member of that.).
In the 70's homosexuals were already 'out of the closet', with the weight of the 'sexual revolution' of the drug subculture behind them. I didn't figure out till years later that the reason those homosexual teachers could get away with stalking and harassing minor male students is the school system where I lived, (both states) were controlled by Freemasons. Every school principal was a 32nd degree Mason, often a Shriner to boot. I recall every teacher's car in the parking lot displaying their masonic flash on the rear, so that the cops would know their lodge and rank, whether Blue Lodge or Shriner or Eastern Star.
I didn't understand it then - but I realized later the talks that principals in two states had with me holding me in contempt, informing me that they would 'make a man' of me. Now I believe they'd seen in my private record that I rejected both homosexual seduction and one offer to recruit me into DeMolay (the Freemason's organization for teenage males. Bill Clinton was a member of that.).
The way homosexual 'seduction'
worked in these cases was the teacher pays unwarranted compliments to the
student, exaggerating their talents, and tells them they can help them get
scholarships for college or other perks. It starts with arranging one-on-one
'field trips' after school or on weekends. At that point the teacher would
invite himself to visit the parent or guardian of the student. I'm sure one
reason these Freemason homosexual teachers targeted me is because I was an only
child under the care of an elderly female relative - a 'widow's son' as the
Mason's say.
Between 1969 and 1971 I knew of five
boys at my school who became homosexuals, and every one of them were 'turned'
by literature teacher who was nicknamed "sexy Rexy". "Rexy"
got busted for turning a State Trooper's son into an effeminate queen. His
house was raided, the newspapers reported the cops found a pound of pot and a
stash of homosexual pornography. I never knew this creep, but I knew three of
the boys involved with him. I watched them all 'go gay' during 9th grade.
Nobody bullied them. On the contrary, the way I remember it homosexuals were
the predators.
I suggest that when we hear reports
of homosexuals that have been threatened by students, it's a reaction to those
homosexuals stalking students that want nothing to do with them.
Kevin said (December 7, 2011):
You say: "Very few homosexuals
are 'born that way'."
In the late '80s I spend a couple of
years in San Francisco. As a normal male, I never had any inclination to have
relations with another male. But I was curious as to why other men seemed to
appreciate a man's body over that of a woman's. On occasion I'd have a drink in
a 'gay' bar. Not the kind where gay porn is on every TV screen dance/trance
music is pumped thru the room, but just the normal kind of bars where typical
people go to drink (whether or not the same or similar establishments still
exist in SF, or anywhere else, is unknown to me). And I would ask these men
questions: "What was your first sexual experience? What was your father
like? Were you always attracted to men?" Would I be believed when I write
this that, to a man, EVERY LAST GAY MALE I SPOKE TO HAD BEEN either abused by
his father or (more likely) step-father or raped by a person in authority; all
while either young or teenaged children?
Today if I were 20 or 21 years old
I'd never have the guts to go ask such questions. I'd likely be accused of HATE
and arrested. But I still appreciate those men for their honesty. Because of
it, I've always been able to see thru the BS fostered upon the public by the
Gay Rights pushers.
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in
English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your
comments at henry@henrymakow.com
- See more at:
http://henrymakow.com/manitoba-bullies-children-who-dont-want-gay-sex.html#sthash.mhPjPs3L.dpuf
No comments:
Post a Comment