Disastrous Passover
The New Stürmer - Volume 8
Dear Friends and Kindred Hearts.
HE SPEAKS
About Cowardly Peoples
"This world is not for cowardly peoples."
— THE BOOK, I:3/96 (HM edition)
He was—and IS—right!
Johann W. Von Goethe
Jews operate according to one important principle: when Order prevails nothing is to be gained.
Through out history many people have been killed so that some Jews can get the blood they need for the ceremonial pastries and bread.
Hammad Nidar Khadatbh
.A 15 year old Palestinian boy found mutilated in an Israeli settlement.
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m43179&hd=&size=1&l=e
On April 18, 2008, the body of a fifteen year old Palestinian boy was found grotesquely mutilated, in an Israeli settlement. This story quickly brought to mind a Jewish holiday, Purim, that has an unpleasant reputation. On this day, murders of Christians are carried out. The worst of these killings took place in Damascus, Syria, in the year 1840.
To go back to the murder of the fifteen year old. At 3pm, on Wednesday, April 16th, the mutilated body of fifteen year old Hammad Nidar Khadatbh was found in the illegal Israeli settlement of Al-hamra by his father who had been searching for his missing son.
(Hammad's father
with picture of his son.)
On Tuesday morning, April 15th, instead of going to school, Hammad left his home at 9 am to work on the family's land to pick cucumbers, which were to be sold in order to help with the income of his struggling family. Their land was located near the stolen agricultural lands of the settlement. When he failed to return home that evening, his father and other family members went searching for him, he could not be found. On Wednesday, the next morning they set out again to find him. They found his body in the same place they had searched the evening before. It was clear that his body was dumped there over night.
Hammad's naked body was bloated and badly tortured. His neck was broken, and his face had been smashed with rocks. One finger had been cut off and there were multiple holes in his torso, seemingly made by a shape, round implement, his family explained. An Israeli police office who arrived to investigate the incident confirmed that that Hammad had been murdered. He made no comment as to who had killed the boy. His body was immediately taken to the coroner in Jerusalem, but the report on the exact cause of his death would not be available for another week.
After speaking to many people in the area, it was established that Hammad had tried to return home via the Al-Hamra (Arabic for "red area") checkpoint, but was refused passage since he had no identification (IDs are only issued to Palestinians aged 16 years and older). Apparently Hammand was then forced to walk the long way home through settlement lands near an Israeli-only apartheid road, and at this point on Tuesday night, he was taken. The family is convinced that Hammad was killed by settlers from the Al-Hamra settlement. His father said that his young son has no enemies, He also said there are no Palestinians in that are
The village of Beit Furig, located near the northern West Bank city of Nablus has 11,500 Palestinians residents who have continuous problems with the illegal settlers near their village. attacks happen when Palestinians go to lands that are anywhere near the illegal settlements.Within the past three years, Mohammad Abu Oday, a 78 year old was killed when settlers from Itamar destroyed his head with large rocks. Another young man was shot dead by settlers, and five others have been injured while attempting to pick their olives. Residents said that these attacks happen when Palestinians go to their lands that are near to the settlements.
Damascus Case
Purim is a Jewish holiday that has an unpleasant reputation, for on this holiday, murders of Christians have been carried out, the worst of these killings too place in Damascus, Syria in the year 1840. That year, the Jewish Festival of Purim fell on the 15th of February.
Father Thomas, a Catholic Monk, disappeared in Damascus on the 5th of February. His servant who went to look for him. also disappeared. The French Consul, Comte Ratt-Menton, began to enquire, and had Sheriff Pasha to investigate. Seven Jews who were arrested, and after receiving chastisement with the bastinado, confessed to the murder of Father Thomas for the sake of his blood.
Four of the men were promised pardon if they would speak the truth. Mousa Abouel-Afieh, who became a Mohammedan, explained that was necessary before he could confess. Aslan Farkhi, Sulliman, a barber, and Mourad el Fahal, fully confessed.
This Damascus massacre had convulsed Europe for a considerable time, but was almost completely forgotten when Jewish Money Power managed to misrepresent and to vilify the individuals who brought the Jews committing the crimes, to justice. Achille Laurent, a member of the Societe Orientale, presented at the trial of the culprits, the full details of their crimes and had the facts of the case in Relation historique des Affaries de Syrie, 1840-1842) published in Arab newspapers, and then later produced in France as a Yellow Book in two volumes, in 1846.
The French Consul, Comte Ratti-Menton, began to make enquiries, and then got the Sheriff Pasha to investigate. Seven Jews were arrested, some after receiving chastisement with the bastinado, confessed to the murder of Father Thomas for the sake of his blood. Four of the men were promised pardon if they would speak the truth. Mousa Abou-el-Afieh, who became a Mohammedan, explained it was necessary before he could confess; Aslan Farkhi; Suliman, a barber, and Mourad el Fathal, all fully confessed that sixteen Jews were involved. All were arrested.
Several Jews, including Mourad el fathal, Mousa Abou-el-Afieh, Isaac Arai and Aaron Arai, described how the blood was collected from the victim's cut throat and then sent to a Rabbi for use in preparing ceremonial bread (pains azymes).The Grand Rabbi, Yakub el Entabi, was brought before the Court of Investigatin to listen to the examination of Mousa Abou-el-Afieh, and to the answers of the others, who confirmed or denied statements made by Mousa. Afterwards, the Rabbi admitted that the blood was required for the ceremonial bread. He also confessed to receiving Father Thomas's blood.
The Jewish Money Power
The Jewish Money Power had endeavoured to make the world believe that according to Turkish custom, the bastinado was torture to make the Jews , who were innocent men, to freely confess. Unfortunately for the Jewish Money Power, one of the questions asked was where the remains of Father Thomas had been disposed; and were found in a covered conduit, where the prisoners said they were. The remains were identified by European doctors as those of Father Thomas. Later, the wretches confessed to killing Father Thomas's servant in the same way, i.e., cutting his throat, collecting his blood, and disposing of the remains, this time in a latrine. No amount of bastinado or torture could wring from an innocent man information as to the whereabouts of the remains of the victim of a murder. The Fourteen Jews were found guilty, ten were condemned to death, and two had died.
This is not intended to horrify; but to expose the methods of Jewish intrigue and corruption used to conceal the guilt of the culprits for fear of the natural reaction of the Gentiles to the facts that became generally known, for as soon as the first reports of the case reached the West of Europe the Jewish Money Power tried to cover the obvious tracks made by the obvious criminals.
Money is known to accomplish wonders in a democracy and also on the Endings and policy of Eastern, and alas! often Western potentates.
The Press Agitation
The usual Jewish lies on their Ritual Murder is that it was "a Gentile invention." Comte Ratti-Menton, the French Consul, who insisted on the investigation, was attacked from every angle; accusing him that the Jews were being unjustly persecuted, in spite of the unquestionable evidence. A tactic they still use today.
Agitation by Public Meetings.
In London, the gullible democracy was induced to attend a big meeting at the Mansion House in London, to denounce the Blood Accusation of which they knew nothing at all, and offer, to the Jews sympathy of the British Nation! Paris, New York, Philadelphia and other towns followed suit without question!
Bribery of the Khedive of Egypt by Money.
Moses Montefiore in England, Cremieux and Munck in France, three of the rich Jews, went off to the East and appealed to the Khedive of Egypt, whose regime included Damascus, for a reversal of the sentence. They offered , and he accepted a huge sum of money as a bribe to release the condemned Jews. Monntefioire and Mujnck proclaimed that the Khedive had reversed the verdict! He had done nothing of the kind. There was no reversal and no re-trial. He released the Jews only because of the numbers of Jews in the population . . . and undoubtedly for cash received. He knew their guilt, and never denied it. Yet the Jewish Encyclopedia (1903, Vol. IV, p. 420) actually ventures to assert that the three rich Jews secured from the 'Khedive a "recognition of the innocence" of the condemned men. The Khedive's price for releasing them is stated to have been half a million piastres. A converted Rabbi, Chevalier P. L. B. Drach, wrote in his The Harmony between the Church and the Synagogue (1844, Paris, p. 79): "Money played a great role in this business."
From the account and demand of Messrs. Moses Montefiore and Cremieux, all Europeans professing the religion of Moses, recognized the liberation and safety for the Jews who have been detained or who have taken flight in the case of the affair of the Monk Father Thomas, missing in Damascus; and his servant, Ibrahim. "And as, because of their numerous population, it would not be convenient (conveyable) to refuse their demand and request, we order that the Jew prisoners shall be released and that the fugitives be given safety for their return. And you will take all possible measures that none are badly treated and that they are left undisturbed everywhere. Such is our will. Mehemet Ali."
Bribery of the Sultan.
After they had won the first round with the Khedive, the Jew Montefiore went on to see the Sultan of Turkey, and secured from him a decree that the Blood Accusation was baseless and that the Jews henceforth were to be on the same footing in the Sultan's dominions as other non-Muslims. The price for this was a huge bribe from the House of Rothschild.
The Sultan Abd-ul-Mejid's firman said: "that a thorough examination of the religious books of the Hebrews has demonstrated the absolute prohibition of the use of either human or animal blood in any of their religious rites. It follows from this defense that the charges against them and their religion are calumnies." This, as shown in Chapter III, is mere sophistry. In 1936 a Miss C. WI. Finn had the effrontery to bring forward the firman as "evidence" that the Blood Accusation is false; as stated in a letter to the Jewish Chronicle, 2nd October, 1936. The wording of the firman is quoted in the Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. I, p. 47 (1906).
Attempted Bribery of the French Consul.
Comte Ratti-Menton, the French Consul who was a most upright man, had shown much determination in having the ritual murderers dealt with, wrote to the Sherif Pasha on the 22nd April , that the Jews had, through the Austrian Consulate, offered him half a million piastres to have the evidence suppressed. Needless to say, when this honorable man was found incorruptible, the advocates of the Jews besmirched his reputation. Thiers, the French Foreign Secretary, replying to Jew-inspired attacks on the French Consul Ratti-Menton, stated in the Chamber of Deputies, 3rd June, 1840, "Let it be known to you, gentlemen, I repeat it, that in all the Chancelleries the Israelites are insistent that affair, and our Consul, can lean only on the Minister of Foreign Affairs for France. A French agent who is in his right, will always be protected against all influences, whatever they may be." M. Thiers also said that the Comte's superior officer, WI. Cochelet, Consul for Egypt, approved of his subordinate's action and that the English Consul was of the same mind.
Bribery of Austrian Diplomats.
Throughout the proceedings, the Austrian Consul supported the Jews against the charge of ritual murder. From a Jewish source the reason is duly confessed in The History of the Jews in Vienna, by the Jew, Max Grunwald, 1936 (Philadelphia, pp. 228-9) states:
"Following the policy of the House [of Rothschild] in other countries, where it obtained privileges for the Jews in return for loans --in Rome, the abolition of the Ghetto, and in England, Jewish emancipation-- Solomon [Rothschild] obtained from Metternich concessions to the Jews in legislation. It was he who influenced the Chancellor to take a favorable stand in the Damascus blood-accusation case of 1840."
Here you can see the power of the Rothschild's money; and the influence on the Austrian Chancellor, Metternich; the Austrian Consul at Damascus; the Consul's attitude towards the Ritual Murder charge. A continuous chain of Jewish corruption with Money.
Suppression of the Reports of the Trial.
The record of the trial published in Achille Laurent's book has been mentioned before. This book can no longer be obtained anywhere. Gougenot des Mousseaux, however, had printed a full account of the trial taken from Laurent's work, Le Juif, le Judaisme et la Judaisation des Peuples Chretiens, which earned him the praise of Pope Pius IX who made him a Chevalier. The writer had a copy of this loaned to him. Gougenot des Mousseaux's book is now very rare, and the Chevalier himself died suddenly in mysterious circumstances nine hours after receiving a warning letter. Monniot, in a work; mentioned in the Bibliography (p. 56), has, however, made it easy for anyone who desires to read the details of the trial to do so.
What about the official dossier of the affair? This naturally reposed in the archives of the French Foreign Office. But Desportes in his Mystere du Sang, reported that under the Ministry of Cremieux (one of the Jews who went East to bribe the Khedive to release the ritual murderers of Damascus) it somehow disappeared (in 1870)! Since this report aroused comment, the Chancellerie made a declaration (5th May, 1892) that the report was incorrect and the dossier remained complete at the Ministry. However that may be, when Albert Monniot in 1913 desired to consult the documents to assist him in writing his Le Crime Rituel chez les Juifs, he was refused permission to peruse them. Whether they still exist, or not, cannot be told, for the secrets of the Jew are well guarded. But hopefully, not well enough, and maybe sometime in the near future, will be found..
Sir Richard Burton. the great explorer and orientalist who was English Consul at Damascus 30 years after the Ritual Murder, studied the question of the Blood Accusation, and: eventually wrote The Jew, the Gypsy and El Islam, of which I have the edition edited by NS. H. Wilkins and published by Hutchinson in 1898. This work contains a damning indictment of the Talmud, and a list of Jewish Ritual Murders, but Wilkins in his Preface (p. x) writes: "In the exercise of the discretion given to me, I have thought it better to hold over for the present the Appendix on the alleged rite of Human Sacrifice among the Sephardim and the murder of Padre Tomaso (Father Thomas); the only alternative was to publish it in a mutilated form."
What about 15 year old Hammad Nidar Khadatbh?
Passover is in the month of Nisan which is from mid March to mid April.Was Hammad killed at the time of Purim because the Jewish settlers needed blood for ceremonial bread or ceremonial pastries? It will never known, Hammad is buried and no independent crime investigation was carried out. His body can not now be examined, and neither can the report the Israeli police will issue, be accepted as the whole truth. It will never be told if Hammad’s blood was drained out of his body.
Hammad's murder will be among the many incomprehensible killings carried out by Jews in connection with their ritual festivals.
(Young Jewish girl with
her Hamman taschen - another type of ceremonial cookies used by Jews)
To overcome the outright lies and audacity - in Yiddish Chutzpah, the truth, in facts, must be spread, loud and clear ...
Please forward this article to all your friends, and to those who are aware that something is drastically wrong in this world, but can't understand what is happening; teach them, and they will learn.
Heil og sael
randulf.johan.hansen
Note: If you have views regarding this article please feel free to contact me, or if you wish to be removed from this list, please advise and you will be taken off .
Visit my website at: hhttp://www.thenewsturmer.com
The New Stürmer - Volume 8
Dear Friends and Kindred Hearts.
HE SPEAKS About Cowardly Peoples
"This world is not for cowardly peoples."
— THE BOOK, I:3/96 (HM edition)
He was—and IS—right!
Johann W. Von Goethe
Jews operate according to one important principle: when Order prevails nothing is to be gained.
Through out history many people have been killed so that some Jews can get the blood they need for the ceremonial pastries and bread.
Hammad Nidar Khadatbh
.A 15 year old Palestinian boy found mutilated in an Israeli settlement.
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m43179&hd=&size=1&l=e
On April 18, 2008, the body of a fifteen year old Palestinian boy was found grotesquely mutilated, in an Israeli settlement. This story quickly brought to mind a Jewish holiday, Purim, that has an unpleasant reputation. On this day, murders of Christians are carried out. The worst of these killings took place in Damascus, Syria, in the year 1840.
To go back to the murder of the fifteen year old. At 3pm, on Wednesday, April 16th, the mutilated body of fifteen year old Hammad Nidar Khadatbh was found in the illegal Israeli settlement of Al-hamra by his father who had been searching for his missing son.
(Hammad's father
with picture of his son.)On Tuesday morning, April 15th, instead of going to school, Hammad left his home at 9 am to work on the family's land to pick cucumbers, which were to be sold in order to help with the income of his struggling family. Their land was located near the stolen agricultural lands of the settlement. When he failed to return home that evening, his father and other family members went searching for him, he could not be found. On Wednesday, the next morning they set out again to find him. They found his body in the same place they had searched the evening before. It was clear that his body was dumped there over night.
Hammad's naked body was bloated and badly tortured. His neck was broken, and his face had been smashed with rocks. One finger had been cut off and there were multiple holes in his torso, seemingly made by a shape, round implement, his family explained. An Israeli police office who arrived to investigate the incident confirmed that that Hammad had been murdered. He made no comment as to who had killed the boy. His body was immediately taken to the coroner in Jerusalem, but the report on the exact cause of his death would not be available for another week.
After speaking to many people in the area, it was established that Hammad had tried to return home via the Al-Hamra (Arabic for "red area") checkpoint, but was refused passage since he had no identification (IDs are only issued to Palestinians aged 16 years and older). Apparently Hammand was then forced to walk the long way home through settlement lands near an Israeli-only apartheid road, and at this point on Tuesday night, he was taken. The family is convinced that Hammad was killed by settlers from the Al-Hamra settlement. His father said that his young son has no enemies, He also said there are no Palestinians in that are
The village of Beit Furig, located near the northern West Bank city of Nablus has 11,500 Palestinians residents who have continuous problems with the illegal settlers near their village. attacks happen when Palestinians go to lands that are anywhere near the illegal settlements.Within the past three years, Mohammad Abu Oday, a 78 year old was killed when settlers from Itamar destroyed his head with large rocks. Another young man was shot dead by settlers, and five others have been injured while attempting to pick their olives. Residents said that these attacks happen when Palestinians go to their lands that are near to the settlements.
Damascus Case
Purim is a Jewish holiday that has an unpleasant reputation, for on this holiday, murders of Christians have been carried out, the worst of these killings too place in Damascus, Syria in the year 1840. That year, the Jewish Festival of Purim fell on the 15th of February.
Father Thomas, a Catholic Monk, disappeared in Damascus on the 5th of February. His servant who went to look for him. also disappeared. The French Consul, Comte Ratt-Menton, began to enquire, and had Sheriff Pasha to investigate. Seven Jews who were arrested, and after receiving chastisement with the bastinado, confessed to the murder of Father Thomas for the sake of his blood.
Four of the men were promised pardon if they would speak the truth. Mousa Abouel-Afieh, who became a Mohammedan, explained that was necessary before he could confess. Aslan Farkhi, Sulliman, a barber, and Mourad el Fahal, fully confessed.
This Damascus massacre had convulsed Europe for a considerable time, but was almost completely forgotten when Jewish Money Power managed to misrepresent and to vilify the individuals who brought the Jews committing the crimes, to justice. Achille Laurent, a member of the Societe Orientale, presented at the trial of the culprits, the full details of their crimes and had the facts of the case in Relation historique des Affaries de Syrie, 1840-1842) published in Arab newspapers, and then later produced in France as a Yellow Book in two volumes, in 1846.
The French Consul, Comte Ratti-Menton, began to make enquiries, and then got the Sheriff Pasha to investigate. Seven Jews were arrested, some after receiving chastisement with the bastinado, confessed to the murder of Father Thomas for the sake of his blood. Four of the men were promised pardon if they would speak the truth. Mousa Abou-el-Afieh, who became a Mohammedan, explained it was necessary before he could confess; Aslan Farkhi; Suliman, a barber, and Mourad el Fathal, all fully confessed that sixteen Jews were involved. All were arrested.
Several Jews, including Mourad el fathal, Mousa Abou-el-Afieh, Isaac Arai and Aaron Arai, described how the blood was collected from the victim's cut throat and then sent to a Rabbi for use in preparing ceremonial bread (pains azymes).The Grand Rabbi, Yakub el Entabi, was brought before the Court of Investigatin to listen to the examination of Mousa Abou-el-Afieh, and to the answers of the others, who confirmed or denied statements made by Mousa. Afterwards, the Rabbi admitted that the blood was required for the ceremonial bread. He also confessed to receiving Father Thomas's blood.
The Jewish Money Power
The Jewish Money Power had endeavoured to make the world believe that according to Turkish custom, the bastinado was torture to make the Jews , who were innocent men, to freely confess. Unfortunately for the Jewish Money Power, one of the questions asked was where the remains of Father Thomas had been disposed; and were found in a covered conduit, where the prisoners said they were. The remains were identified by European doctors as those of Father Thomas. Later, the wretches confessed to killing Father Thomas's servant in the same way, i.e., cutting his throat, collecting his blood, and disposing of the remains, this time in a latrine. No amount of bastinado or torture could wring from an innocent man information as to the whereabouts of the remains of the victim of a murder. The Fourteen Jews were found guilty, ten were condemned to death, and two had died.
This is not intended to horrify; but to expose the methods of Jewish intrigue and corruption used to conceal the guilt of the culprits for fear of the natural reaction of the Gentiles to the facts that became generally known, for as soon as the first reports of the case reached the West of Europe the Jewish Money Power tried to cover the obvious tracks made by the obvious criminals.
Money is known to accomplish wonders in a democracy and also on the Endings and policy of Eastern, and alas! often Western potentates.
The Press Agitation
The usual Jewish lies on their Ritual Murder is that it was "a Gentile invention." Comte Ratti-Menton, the French Consul, who insisted on the investigation, was attacked from every angle; accusing him that the Jews were being unjustly persecuted, in spite of the unquestionable evidence. A tactic they still use today.
Agitation by Public Meetings.
In London, the gullible democracy was induced to attend a big meeting at the Mansion House in London, to denounce the Blood Accusation of which they knew nothing at all, and offer, to the Jews sympathy of the British Nation! Paris, New York, Philadelphia and other towns followed suit without question!
Bribery of the Khedive of Egypt by Money.
Moses Montefiore in England, Cremieux and Munck in France, three of the rich Jews, went off to the East and appealed to the Khedive of Egypt, whose regime included Damascus, for a reversal of the sentence. They offered , and he accepted a huge sum of money as a bribe to release the condemned Jews. Monntefioire and Mujnck proclaimed that the Khedive had reversed the verdict! He had done nothing of the kind. There was no reversal and no re-trial. He released the Jews only because of the numbers of Jews in the population . . . and undoubtedly for cash received. He knew their guilt, and never denied it. Yet the Jewish Encyclopedia (1903, Vol. IV, p. 420) actually ventures to assert that the three rich Jews secured from the 'Khedive a "recognition of the innocence" of the condemned men. The Khedive's price for releasing them is stated to have been half a million piastres. A converted Rabbi, Chevalier P. L. B. Drach, wrote in his The Harmony between the Church and the Synagogue (1844, Paris, p. 79): "Money played a great role in this business."
From the account and demand of Messrs. Moses Montefiore and Cremieux, all Europeans professing the religion of Moses, recognized the liberation and safety for the Jews who have been detained or who have taken flight in the case of the affair of the Monk Father Thomas, missing in Damascus; and his servant, Ibrahim. "And as, because of their numerous population, it would not be convenient (conveyable) to refuse their demand and request, we order that the Jew prisoners shall be released and that the fugitives be given safety for their return. And you will take all possible measures that none are badly treated and that they are left undisturbed everywhere. Such is our will. Mehemet Ali."
Bribery of the Sultan.
After they had won the first round with the Khedive, the Jew Montefiore went on to see the Sultan of Turkey, and secured from him a decree that the Blood Accusation was baseless and that the Jews henceforth were to be on the same footing in the Sultan's dominions as other non-Muslims. The price for this was a huge bribe from the House of Rothschild.
The Sultan Abd-ul-Mejid's firman said: "that a thorough examination of the religious books of the Hebrews has demonstrated the absolute prohibition of the use of either human or animal blood in any of their religious rites. It follows from this defense that the charges against them and their religion are calumnies." This, as shown in Chapter III, is mere sophistry. In 1936 a Miss C. WI. Finn had the effrontery to bring forward the firman as "evidence" that the Blood Accusation is false; as stated in a letter to the Jewish Chronicle, 2nd October, 1936. The wording of the firman is quoted in the Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. I, p. 47 (1906).
Attempted Bribery of the French Consul.
Comte Ratti-Menton, the French Consul who was a most upright man, had shown much determination in having the ritual murderers dealt with, wrote to the Sherif Pasha on the 22nd April , that the Jews had, through the Austrian Consulate, offered him half a million piastres to have the evidence suppressed. Needless to say, when this honorable man was found incorruptible, the advocates of the Jews besmirched his reputation. Thiers, the French Foreign Secretary, replying to Jew-inspired attacks on the French Consul Ratti-Menton, stated in the Chamber of Deputies, 3rd June, 1840, "Let it be known to you, gentlemen, I repeat it, that in all the Chancelleries the Israelites are insistent that affair, and our Consul, can lean only on the Minister of Foreign Affairs for France. A French agent who is in his right, will always be protected against all influences, whatever they may be." M. Thiers also said that the Comte's superior officer, WI. Cochelet, Consul for Egypt, approved of his subordinate's action and that the English Consul was of the same mind.
Bribery of Austrian Diplomats.
Throughout the proceedings, the Austrian Consul supported the Jews against the charge of ritual murder. From a Jewish source the reason is duly confessed in The History of the Jews in Vienna, by the Jew, Max Grunwald, 1936 (Philadelphia, pp. 228-9) states:
"Following the policy of the House [of Rothschild] in other countries, where it obtained privileges for the Jews in return for loans --in Rome, the abolition of the Ghetto, and in England, Jewish emancipation-- Solomon [Rothschild] obtained from Metternich concessions to the Jews in legislation. It was he who influenced the Chancellor to take a favorable stand in the Damascus blood-accusation case of 1840."
Here you can see the power of the Rothschild's money; and the influence on the Austrian Chancellor, Metternich; the Austrian Consul at Damascus; the Consul's attitude towards the Ritual Murder charge. A continuous chain of Jewish corruption with Money.
Suppression of the Reports of the Trial.
The record of the trial published in Achille Laurent's book has been mentioned before. This book can no longer be obtained anywhere. Gougenot des Mousseaux, however, had printed a full account of the trial taken from Laurent's work, Le Juif, le Judaisme et la Judaisation des Peuples Chretiens, which earned him the praise of Pope Pius IX who made him a Chevalier. The writer had a copy of this loaned to him. Gougenot des Mousseaux's book is now very rare, and the Chevalier himself died suddenly in mysterious circumstances nine hours after receiving a warning letter. Monniot, in a work; mentioned in the Bibliography (p. 56), has, however, made it easy for anyone who desires to read the details of the trial to do so.
What about the official dossier of the affair? This naturally reposed in the archives of the French Foreign Office. But Desportes in his Mystere du Sang, reported that under the Ministry of Cremieux (one of the Jews who went East to bribe the Khedive to release the ritual murderers of Damascus) it somehow disappeared (in 1870)! Since this report aroused comment, the Chancellerie made a declaration (5th May, 1892) that the report was incorrect and the dossier remained complete at the Ministry. However that may be, when Albert Monniot in 1913 desired to consult the documents to assist him in writing his Le Crime Rituel chez les Juifs, he was refused permission to peruse them. Whether they still exist, or not, cannot be told, for the secrets of the Jew are well guarded. But hopefully, not well enough, and maybe sometime in the near future, will be found..
Sir Richard Burton. the great explorer and orientalist who was English Consul at Damascus 30 years after the Ritual Murder, studied the question of the Blood Accusation, and: eventually wrote The Jew, the Gypsy and El Islam, of which I have the edition edited by NS. H. Wilkins and published by Hutchinson in 1898. This work contains a damning indictment of the Talmud, and a list of Jewish Ritual Murders, but Wilkins in his Preface (p. x) writes: "In the exercise of the discretion given to me, I have thought it better to hold over for the present the Appendix on the alleged rite of Human Sacrifice among the Sephardim and the murder of Padre Tomaso (Father Thomas); the only alternative was to publish it in a mutilated form."
What about 15 year old Hammad Nidar Khadatbh?
Passover is in the month of Nisan which is from mid March to mid April.Was Hammad killed at the time of Purim because the Jewish settlers needed blood for ceremonial bread or ceremonial pastries? It will never known, Hammad is buried and no independent crime investigation was carried out. His body can not now be examined, and neither can the report the Israeli police will issue, be accepted as the whole truth. It will never be told if Hammad’s blood was drained out of his body.
Hammad's murder will be among the many incomprehensible killings carried out by Jews in connection with their ritual festivals.
(Young Jewish girl with
her Hamman taschen - another type of ceremonial cookies used by Jews)To overcome the outright lies and audacity - in Yiddish Chutzpah, the truth, in facts, must be spread, loud and clear ...
Please forward this article to all your friends, and to those who are aware that something is drastically wrong in this world, but can't understand what is happening; teach them, and they will learn.
Heil og sael
randulf.johan.hansen
Note: If you have views regarding this article please feel free to contact me, or if you wish to be removed from this list, please advise and you will be taken off .
Visit my website at: hhttp://www.thenewsturmer.com
No comments:
Post a Comment