The
911 Cover-Up: Same Song, Different Verse
Part
1
By Dave Hodges
September 10, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
"History does not repeat itself, It rhymes" -Mark
Twain
When does a country turn the page on a tragedy for the last
time and finally move on?
I watched with great hope and anticipation as two
generations of Americans demanded justice for JFK’s murder as most of the
country rejected the official governmental explanations with cries to reopen
the investigation into his death. Unfortunately, these cries fell upon
arrogant, deaf ears. From the late 1960’s through mid 1990’s people such as Jim
Marrs, Oliver Stone and Bill Kurtis kept the pressure on the mainstream media
which forced them to give some scant attention to the fact that many did not
accept Warren Commission Report and The House Select Committee on the JFK
Assassination did not dig deep enough. In 2010, I no longer hold out hope that
President John F. Kennedy will ever receive the justice that he and his family
deserve. Sadly, Americans have finally lost interest in finding out whom and
what was behind the conspiracy to murder JFK.
Just how does a country decide when to give up its quest for
the truth? Is it as easy as some media type, or shadowy figure behind the
scenes, pressing the delete button as we collectively and instantly move on to
something new? How long will it be until our collective desires for justice and
retribution, for the 911 victims, fade into the distant past in the same manner
as has the JFK assassination? Sadly, I am seeing increasing evidence that 911
is a topic that is becoming as tired and as worn out as the conspiracy to
murder John Kennedy has become. However, as long as I have a forum of public
expression, in each September of every year that I have breath, I will continue
to seek redemption and justice for 3000+ murdered Americans who should have returned
safely home to their husbands, wives, sons and daughters in the evening hours
of 9/11.
Shortly after 911, most politically aware Americans were
cognizant of the fact that the events of 911 and the subsequent investigation
by the 911 Commission, was this generation’s version of the JFK Assassination.
In other words, the government was lying to its citizens and anyone with an IQ
above room temperature knew it.
*******
*******
Within a few years, a growing number of Americans understood
that the false flag event that we referred to as 911 was being used as the
excuse to usher in a modern day Nazi Germany version of a police state and
thrust it down the throats of the American people (e.g., The Military
Commissions Act, Patriot Acts I & II, etc.). What many people still do not
realize is why this police state is being installed with such thoroughness,
rapidity and for what ultimate purpose. In other words, what ultimate agenda
lies behind the installation of this draconian police state resulting from the
events of 911? This question and this question alone provides every American
with sufficient reasons to keep pressing for the truth. Because around every
corner of every conspiracy lies the true agenda. After John Kennedy died,
56,000 American soldiers also died who didn’t have to in the debacle called Vietnam as a
direct result of his death.
These conspiracies have real consequences when they go
unchecked and unpunished. If America
would simply take the time to lift up the covers and ask why the aftermath of
911 demanded the complete gutting of the Constitution and why must we be
subjected incessant and intrusive monitoring by our Federal government, the
historical answers rhyme, as Mark Twain would say, with Germany in the
decade of the 1930’s. Ultimately, my life and your life may depend on pressing
forward and demanding the truth.
Meanwhile, we are supposed to
believe that 19 Muslims armed with no more than box cutters
could turn every time honored American liberty on its ear. If this is the case,
then call all our troops home because we have already lost the war.
A general historical rule of thumb states that one cannot
judge the true implications of landmark events for at least 20 years following
the event. History has indeed demonstrated that a culture is not a good judge
of its own immediate history. With regard to the events of 911, we are now
halfway through this historical prohibition related to the judging the
significance of a landmark event. However, in just one short decade, a clear
and unmistakable pattern has already taken shape. The implications of 911 are
undeniably ominous and these implications will be fully felt for decades to
come unless the slumbering masses awake from their corporate media induced coma
and take matters into their own hands.
Pearl
Harbor is often heralded as the most defining event in
the 20th Century. The events surrounding that fateful December 7th day have
been meticulously investigated (e.g., battle tactics, leadership ineptitudes
and conspiracy theories). Don’t the three thousand victims of 911 deserve any
less of an analysis? Apparently, the United States Government does not think
so. Therefore, in the absence of full disclosure, the American people are left
to conduct their own investigations. However, for many who have dared to
question the official 911 Commission Report, as was the case with flawed Warren
Commission Report, they have been frequently met with unyielding oppression
which has often resulted in the researchers and skeptics being fired and
publicly humiliated (e.g., Steve Jones, Van Jones).
At my own peril, I freely confess that I, too, have serious
doubts about the validity of the findings of the 911 Commission. The findings
of the 911 Commission are neither complete nor completely believable in their
present form. Here is a brief and partial summary of my unanswered questions
related to 911.
Unanswered
Questions Regarding 911
1. Why was the video of the Mineta testimony removed from
the 9/11 Commission website?
2. Why hasn’t the government addressed the "coincidence"
of Able Danger?
3. What explains the failure of the Government to release
the many videotapes of the plane, on approach, that struck the Pentagon?
4. Why was there a change in the scramble/intercept
procedure three months prior to 911 for jets that are off course accompanied by
a change in the shoot down orders?
5. What can explain the failure of the government to
scramble jets over a period of an hour and twenty eight minutes between the Twin Towers
being struck and the crash in Pennsylvania?
6. How could the unrelated events of 911 and the subsequent
invasion of Iraq
be successfully linked which culminated in the demise of Saddam Hussein despite
strong evidence to the contrary that the reasons for invasion (e.g., weapons of
mass destruction) were never found by our occupation forces?
7. What explains the well documented (e.g., Kevin Phillips)
Bush/Cheney plans to invade both Afghanistan
and Iraq
which was set forth within the first 10 days of the Bush Administration? These
invasions were planned well in advance of 911. Why wasn’t this contradiction
investigated?
8. The well documented engineering and architectural
arguments which clearly demonstrates that the fire and heat generated by the
planes striking the Twin
Towers were insufficient
to melt the core of the buildings. Why doesn’t this evidence support the 911
Commission findings?
9. What could explain the almost near free-fall collapse of
all three towers which defies the official explanation?
10. Where are the pieces of plane wings that supposedly
struck light poles on its approach to the Pentagon?
11. The attack upon the Pentagon appears to any layman who
looks at this evidence to look more like a missile strike than an airplane
crash. Why does the circumference of the hole in the Pentagon greatly differ
from the width of the plane? Why is there an exit hole on the backside of the
building since the plane melted upon impact? Where was the debris field that
one would expect on the backside of the building?
12. With all the large buildings that have been struck by
planes, why are the Twin
Towers the only ones to
collapse in a pancake fashion in a manner similar to a planned demolition?
Also, what about the pop outs that are clearly visible on the video, Loose
Change?
13. Where are the skid marks on the lawn prior to impact at
the Pentagon?
14. What about the evidence which strongly suggests that 11
nations warned us about the possibility of such an attack down to the day and
hour?
15. Maintenance worker, William Rodriguez, was the last man
out of the Twin Towers. At 8:46AM, Rodriguez reports
that he heard two distinct explosions, seven seconds apart, which emanated from
the floors below him. Rodriguez also reports the two explosions occurred before
the planes hit the towers. Rodriguez was interviewed by the 911 Commission for
30 minutes, in secret, behind closed doors. His testimony is conspicuously
absent from the 911 Report. So why did the last man out of the Towers manage to
have his testimony left out of the 911 Commission Report?
16. Brigham
Young University
professor, Steve Jones, concluded that super thermite was used
to bring down the Towers, including Tower 7, through a controlled demolition.
Jones contends that he was warned by governmental officials that if he
published his results his personal “pain would be great.” And the warning
proved prophetic as Jones was fired, …er… forced into retirement, after
publishing his results. How does a tenured university professor get fired for
publishing legitimate research results when the peer review process could have
been utilized to analyze the validity of Jones’ claims?
17. Ground Zero rescue worker, Mike Bellone, claims he was
approached by unknown FBI agents a short time after he and his partner,
Nicholas DeMasi, a retired New York
firefighter, found the “black boxes” among the WTC rubble before January 2002.
In the 911 Commission Report, Chapter 1, footnote 76, there is the sole but
definitive reference to the airline “black boxes”: “The CVR’s and the FDR’s
[voice and flight data recorders] from American 11 and United 175 were not
found.” With this obvious contradiction, why weren’t these two rescue workers
interviewed by the 911 Commission?
18. How could all four black boxes not be retrieved by the
FBI when nearly ALL crashes, through course of modern aviation history, do
result in the ultimate retrieval of the black box? This is reminiscent of
recent events when it was revealed on The Common Sense Show with Dave Hodges
8-29-2010, by maritime and oil clean up expert, Captain Kelley Sweeney, that the
black box from the now infamous Trans Ocean oil rig, in the Gulf, along with
the tape recordings, which is a required part of every oil rig, went missing
following the explosion which led to the greatest maritime disaster in the
history of the planet. Does anyone else feel like connecting these dots?
19. When LBJ ordered JFK’s
presidential limousine stripped and cleaned before a criminal investigation
could take place, he effectively destroyed the primary crime scene evidence in
the murder of JFK and dashed the hopes of America’s genuine search for the
truth. In a striking parallel, 41 truckloads of debris were
hauled away from Twin
Towers within hours of
the crime. Both events are felonies as they clearly represent the tampering of
evidence connected with a crime scene. Why didn’t the 911 Commission Report
address the question as to why normal crime scene investigative techniques were
not employed at Ground Zero?
20. Why was LBJ allowed to sequester the JFK assassination
evidence in a locked vault beneath the National Archives until the year 2033?
Didn’t the American taxpayers foot the bill for this investigation? In the
minds of the government, wasn’t the investigation completed? Are American
citizens no more than little children who have to be protected from the truth?
If not, then why can’t we look at the evidence? In another striking case of
history rhyming with an earlier time, much of the remaining 911 crime scene
evidence is still being held under lock and key at Hangar 17 at JFK Airport
and the government is not letting anyone in to examine the evidence which
underlies the 911 Commission findings. A decade later and with the ink dry on
the 911 Commission’s findings, why isn’t the evidence being made available to
journalists and investigators? What is the government afraid of? Or more
accurately, what does the government have to hide? Even Ray Charles could see
an unmistakable pattern and deceit and cover-up.
For several decades following the JFK Assassination, the
American people engaged in a parlor game of questioning and debating the
evidence associated with The Warren Report (e.g., the timing problem,
the magic bullet, etc.). However, only a few of these discussions ever
reached the level of why JFK had to be eliminated (e.g., for his actions
detrimental to the Federal Reserve Board through the printing and distribution
of C notes, JFK’s opposition to the military industrial complex’s desire to go
to war in Vietnam, JFK’s planned elimination of the oil depletion allowance,
JFK’s intent to reduce nuclear arms production and JFK’s announced intention to
break the CIA into a 1,000 pieces following the Bay of Pigs fiasco).
The events of 911 have followed an eerily similar pattern
when objectively compared to the JFK assassination and the handling of the
evidence in both cases. These facts, by themselves, are enough to get one to
seriously consider that the same kind of interests, who murdered Jack Kennedy,
planned and carried out the events of 911 because the modus operandi is nearly
identical in both events. Certainly, the requisite patsies are in place whether
they be the inept Marine Corps marksman, Lee Oswald who did an unduplicated
world class shooting performance in 1963, or the 19 Muslims armed with only box
cutters who managed against all odds to hijack four airliners with three of the
four reaching their final destination while under the control of amateur pilots
at best.
In both cases, the evidence has been suppressed and
withheld, In both cases the American people are being told that you do not have
the right to know that the behind-the-scenes-puppet masters know and what truly
happened under their watch, whether the event is a coup de tat, or a pretext to
invade a series of foreign countries rich in natural resources. In other words,
911 is the same song as the JFK Assassination, only a different verse and far
too many Americans just keep humming the melody of this sad song right along
with the composers of these events.
No comments:
Post a Comment