Was America attacked by Muslims on 9/11?
The official story of Bush Zionist administration says – YES, four commercial planes hijacked by 19 Muslims were involved in attacks on WTC, the Pentagon, and intended attack on the White House. However, the events of the first few days showed that six of those ‘hijackers’ were reported alive in Saudi Arabia, while five Israelis were arrested for dancing in front of falling WTC.
Professor David Ray Griffin is one of many western intellectuals, who refuse to believe the official story based on their research. Griffin is author of 34 books including seven on 9/11. His research article Was America attacked by Muslims on 9/11?, published on September 9. 2008, in which he raises the following sixteen questions for the readers to probe.
1. Was Mohammad Atta and other hijackers devout Muslims? According to the San Francisco Chronicle – Atta and other hijackers were involved in drinking, gambling, and flirting with lap dancers and bringing call girls to their rooms. All these activities are major sins in Islam.
2. Do authorities have hard evidence about Osama Bin Laden’s responsibility for 9/11? Professor Griffin’s response is NO – as while Bush and Colin Powell both promised to bring-out the evidence – the always shied away.
3. Was evidence of Muslims hijakers provided by provided by phone calls from the airliners? Nope. Another propaganda lie – as the cellphone technology in 2001 could not have worked from more than a few thousand feets – and certainly not from 30,000 feet above when these reported calls were received identifying hijackers to be Middle Eastern looking and even some believed them to be Muslims – even though there are over one million Arab Jew settlers in Israel, who looks like Muslim Arabs and speak Arabic fluently like Muslim and Christian Arabs.
4. Was the presence of hijackers proved by a radio transmission “from American 11″? The answer is NO again. According to the 9/11 Commission – the air trafic controller for this flight heard a transmission message at 8:25 AM – however, the FAA’s “Summary of Air Trafic Hijack Events”, published September 17, 2001 – reported that “the transmission was from unknown origin”.
5. Did the passports and headband provides evidence that Al-Qaeda operatives were on the flights? The claim of FBI that a passport proving the existence of one of hijackers, Satam al-Suqami, was found in the rubbles of WTC, a melt-down of heavy concrete and steel into small pieces – is as ridiculous as some idiots may believe that pigs can fly too!
6. Did the information in Atta’s luggage prove the responsibility of Al-Qaeda operatives? Another joke one must say. Why the flight computer and other detective devices could not all those “dangerous materials” when his luggage was being transferred to flight 11 – and why the heck someone carry his will when he known for sure that he is not going to come alive?
7. Were Al-Qaeda operatives captured on Airport Security Videos? The answer is NO again. The frames from video being used to prove their existence was nothing but a fabrication – because they show airport at Portland and not Boston’s Logan Airport.
8. Were the names of “hijackers” on the Passenger Manifests? As a matter of fact – the passenger manifests released to public included no names of the so-called “19 hijackers” and no Middle Eastern names for that matter.
9. Did DNA tests identify five hijackers among the victims at the Pentagon? Nope. The Washington Post reported – “The remains of five hijackers have been identified through a process of exclusion, as they did not match DNA samples provided by the families of all 183 victims who died at the site.”
10. Has the claim that some of the so-called “hijackers” still alive been debunked? Certainly not though Zionists’ controlled CNN and Der Spiegel did ridiculously.
11. Is there possitive evidence that no hickers were on the planes? Now, since there were no Arab names on the pessenger manifestos and proven by DNA – why and who fabricated those lies – and for whom interests – other than Israel and neocons in Bush administration? Furthermore, all pilots are trained to enter hijack Code 7500 into their transponders to alert controllers on the ground. Now one may ask – “Why those idiots piloting those four hijacked planes did not do that?”
12. Were Bin Laden andAl-Qaeda capable of orchestrating the attacks? Several people including former chief of Pakistan’s intelligence agency, General Hamid Gul, believes that not only Al-Qaeda, but none of the Muslim countries have capablities to pull such sophisticated attack without having moles inside the White House and the Pentagon.
13. Could Hani Hanjour have flown Flight 77 into the Pentagon? Could no be – because according to CBS, the Aeizona flight school record show that Hani was so lousey that he could have passed a commercial liscence of any kind.
14. Would an Al-Qaeda pilot have executed that manuever? The answer is NO again.
15. Could Al-Qaeda operatives have brought down the World Trade Center buildings? The law of physics says, NO.
16. Would Al-Qaeda operatives have imploded the buildings? Cannot do – It was an Inside Job.
No comments:
Post a Comment